Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3525 (2026)

Criminal history record information; review by person in interest; identity; verification

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person in interest, who asserts that he or she has reason to believe that criminal history information relating to him or her or the person in whose interest he or she acts is maintained by any system in this state, shall be entitled to review and receive a copy of such information for the purpose of determining its accuracy and completeness by making application to the agency operating such system. The applicant shall provide satisfactory verification of the subject's identity, which shall include name, date, and place of birth, and, when identification is doubtful, a set of fingerprint impressions may be taken upon fingerprint cards or forms commonly used for law enforcement purposes by law enforcement agencies. The review authorized by this section shall be limited to a review of criminal history record information.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1993–2020 · leading case: State ex rel. BH Media Grp. v. Frakes, 305 Neb. 780 (Neb. 2020).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State ex rel. BH Media Grp. v. Frakes, 305 Neb. 780 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “The relator claimed that he had a heightened interest in obtaining the records, because he was entitled to review information regarding his criminal history record as provided by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3525 (Reissue 1989).”

State Ex Rel. Sileven v. Spire, 500 N.W.2d 179 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “The relator claims that since he is a person in interest as defined in § 29-3514, he is entitled to review his “criminal history record information” as provided by § 29-3525. The “criminal history record information” the relator claims he is entitled to review is defined as…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.