Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4601 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 29-4601 to 29-4608 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Claims for Wrongful Conviction and Imprisonment Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2014–2019 · leading case: Marie v. State, 922 N.W.2d 733 (Neb. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marie v. State, 922 N.W.2d 733 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 3× “Although our reasoning differs from that of the district court, the district court did not err in dismissing Marie's petition, and we accordingly affirm.”
Nadeem v. State, 904 N.W.2d 244 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “Nadeem appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, which reversed the district court’s dis­ missal.”
Hess v. State, 843 N.W.2d 648 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 2× “1 The district court concluded that Hess failed to 1 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-4601 to 29-4608 (Cum.”
Marie v. State, 302 Neb. 217 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 3× “Marie appealed her sentences as excessive, and the Nebraska Court of Appeals agreed and resentenced her to 1 year’s imprisonment on each conviction.2 Because Marie had already served 2 years’ imprisonment, she was released.”
Dean v. State, No. S-12-974, S-12-975 (Neb. July 18, 2014). · cites it 2× “” Dean 1 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-4601 to 29-4608 (Cum.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4601(3): 2 cases
Marie v. State, 922 N.W.2d 733 (Neb. 2019). “Although our reasoning differs from that of the district court, the district court did not err in dismissing Marie's petition, and we accordingly affirm.”
Marie v. State, 302 Neb. 217 (Neb. 2019). “Marie appealed her sentences as excessive, and the Nebraska Court of Appeals agreed and resentenced her to 1 year’s imprisonment on each conviction.2 Because Marie had already served 2 years’ imprisonment, she was released.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.