(a) Whether the proceedings are formal or informal, persons who are not disqualified have priority for appointment in the following order:
(1) the person with priority as determined by a probated will including a person nominated by a power conferred in a will;
(2) the surviving spouse of the decedent who is a devisee of the decedent;
(3) other devisees of the decedent;
(4) the surviving spouse of the decedent;
(5) other heirs of the decedent;
(6) forty-five days after the death of the decedent, any creditor.
(b) An objection to an appointment can be made only in formal proceedings. In case of objection the priorities stated in (a) apply except that
(1) if the estate appears to be more than adequate to meet exemptions and costs of administration but inadequate to discharge anticipated unsecured claims, the court, on petition of a creditor, may appoint any qualified person;
(2) in case of objection to appointment of a person other than one whose priority is determined by will by an heir or devisee appearing to have a substantial interest in the estate, the court may appoint a person who is acceptable to heirs and devisees whose interests in the estate appear to be worth in total more than half of the probable distributable value or, in default of this accord, any suitable person.
(c) A person entitled to letters under (2) through (5) of (a) above, and a person aged eighteen and over who would be entitled to letters but for his age, may nominate a qualified person to act as personal representative. Any person aged eighteen and over may renounce his right to nominate or to an appointment by appropriate writing filed with the court. When two or more persons share a priority, those of them who do not renounce must concur in nominating another to act for them, or in applying for appointment.
(d) Conservators of the estates of protected persons, or if there is no conservator, any guardian except a guardian ad litem of a minor or incapacitated person, may exercise the same right to nominate, to object to another's appointment, or to participate in determining the preference of a majority in interest of the heirs and devisees that the protected person or ward would have if qualified for appointment.
(e) Appointment of one who does not have priority may be made only in formal proceedings except that appointment of one having priority resulting from renunciation or nomination may be made in informal proceedings. Before appointing one without priority, the court must determine that those having priority, although given notice of the proceedings, have failed to request appointment or to nominate another for appointment, and that administration is necessary.
(f) No person is qualified to serve as a personal representative who is:
(1) under the age of nineteen;
(2) a person whom the court finds unsuitable in formal proceedings.
(g) A personal representative appointed by a court of the decedent's domicile has priority over all other persons except where the decedent's will nominates different persons to be personal representative in this state and in the state of domicile. The domiciliary personal representative may nominate another, who shall have the same priority as the domiciliary personal representative.
(h) This section governs priority for appointment of a successor personal representative but does not apply to the selection of a special administrator.
Notes of Decisions
Abbott v. Sellon (In Re Est.), 299 Neb. 596 (Neb. 2018).
· cites it 4× “While rights of priority among persons seeking appointment, "who are not disqualified," are set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (Reissue 2016), no determination of appointment in the formal proceeding has yet been made.”
In Re Est. of Sutherlin, 622 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 2001).
· cites it 14× “The county court held that Sutherlin failed to comply with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (c) (Reissue 1995).”
In Re Est. of Casselman, 365 N.W.2d 805 (Neb. 1985).
· cites it 6× “Kyla and Edgar appeal to this court, alleging as error that the district court failed “to find that the County Court had not proceeded according to the provisions of [ Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (Reissue 1979)] of the Nebraska Probate Code in appointing Harry Meister as personal…”
In Re Est. of Trew, 507 N.W.2d 478 (Neb. 1993).
· cites it 3× “) The application failed to note that Earl’s children, as devisees, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (Reissue 1989) had priority to be appointed personal representative.”
In re Est. of Abbott-Ochsner, 299 Neb. 596 (Neb. 2018).
· cites it 4× “While rights of priority among persons seeking appoint- ment, “who are not disqualified,” are set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (Reissue 2016), no determination of appoint- ment in the formal proceeding has yet been made.”
In re Est. of Anderson, 974 N.W.2d 847 (Neb. 2022).
· cites it 2× “that after notice to interested persons, including all persons interested in the administration of the estate as successors under the applicable assumption concern- ing testacy, any previously appointed personal representative, and any person having or claiming priority for…”
In Re Est. of Wilson, 594 N.W.2d 695 (Neb. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (a)(6) (Reissue 1995), which provides that a creditor may be appointed as a personal representative 45 days after the death of decedent, if no person with higher priority has applied.”
In Re Est. of Watson, 348 N.W.2d 856 (Neb. 1984).
· cites it 4× “Section 30-2353(b) provides: (b) For purposes of parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this article and of section 30-2412, a surviving spouse does not include: (1) an individual who obtains or consents to a final decree or judgment of divorce from the decedent or an annulment or dissolution…”
In Re Est. of Pfeiffer, 658 N.W.2d 14 (Neb. 2003).
· cites it 2× “(b) For purposes of parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this article and of section 30-2412, a surviving spouse does not include: (3) an individual who was a party to a valid proceeding concluded by an order purporting to terminate all marital property rights against the decedent.”
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Dulek, 504 F. Supp. 1015 (D. Neb. 1980).
· cites it 2× “(b) For purposes of parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this article and of section 30-2412, a surviving spouse does not include: (1) an individual who obtains or consents to a final decree or judgment of divorce from the decedent or an annulment or dissolution of their marriage, which…”
Schissler v. Foote, 279 N.W.2d 614 (Neb. 1979).
· cites it 6× “1943, was repealed and re *601 placed by section 30-2412, R. R. S. 1943, which became operative on January 1, 1977.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412(a) — 1 case
In Re Est. of Sutherlin, 622 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 2001).
“The county court held that Sutherlin failed to comply with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (c) (Reissue 1995).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412(a)(3) — 1 case
In Re Est. of Trew, 507 N.W.2d 478 (Neb. 1993).
“) The application failed to note that Earl’s children, as devisees, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (Reissue 1989) had priority to be appointed personal representative.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412(b)(2) — 1 case
In Re Est. of Sutherlin, 622 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 2001).
“The county court held that Sutherlin failed to comply with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (c) (Reissue 1995).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412(c) — 1 case
In Re Est. of Sutherlin, 622 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 2001).
“The county court held that Sutherlin failed to comply with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (c) (Reissue 1995).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412(e) — 1 case
In Re Est. of Sutherlin, 622 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 2001).
“The county court held that Sutherlin failed to comply with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2412 (c) (Reissue 1995).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.