Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2655 (2026)

Limitation of powers or appointment of conservator

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The court may, at the time of appointment or later, limit the powers of a conservator otherwise conferred by sections 30-2653 and 30-2654, or previously conferred by the court, and may at any time relieve the conservator of any limitation. If the court limits any power conferred on the conservator by section 30-2653 or 30-2654, the limitation shall be endorsed upon the conservator's letters of appointment.

(b) A conservator shall not change a protected person's place of abode to a location outside of the State of Nebraska without court permission.

(c) A conservator shall not accept an appointment for a conservatorship of an individual if the conservator serves as a permanent guardian or conservator for twenty or more individuals. Temporary conservatorships or guardianships shall not count toward such limit.

(d) The limitation described in subsection (c) of this section shall not apply to a corporate entity serving as a conservator.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: In Re Conservatorship of Hanson, 670 N.W.2d 460 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Conservatorship of Hanson, 670 N.W.2d 460 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “The trial court found that Margaret paid herself from conservatorship funds in violation of her letters of conservatorship, which stated that “without prior Order of the Court: You shall not pay yourself or your attorney compensation from the assets or income of [Cooper].”

In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Stephen S. (Neb. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “To the extent that Stephen is arguing that the court should have limited the powers of the conservator as contemplated by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2655 (Reissue 2016), we reject that notion on this record.”

In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Mueller (Neb. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2655 (Cum. Supp. 2014).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.