Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2724 (2026)

Alteration of rights

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Rights at death under section 30-2723 are determined by the type of account at the death of a party. The type of account may be altered by written notice given by a party to the financial institution to change the type of account or to stop or vary payment under the terms of the account. The notice must be signed by a party and received by the financial institution during the party's lifetime.

(b) A right of survivorship arising from the express terms of the account, section 30-2723, or a POD designation, may not be altered by will.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2002–2017 · leading case: Newman v. Thomas, 652 N.W.2d 565 (Neb. 2002).
Newman v. Thomas, 652 N.W.2d 565 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 30× “*806 The district court determined that § 30-2724 governs changing a non-POD, single-party account into a POD account.”
In Re Trust of Rosenberg, 727 N.W.2d 430 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2724 (b) (Reissue 1995).”
Clarke v. First Nat. Bank of Omaha, 895 N.W.2d 284 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “Despite FNB’s internal procedure and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2724 (a) (Reissue 2016), each requiring signed written notice before changing an account’s type, Craven made the change to the Account before Hilda signed a new account agreement.”
Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A. v. Katzberg, 661 N.W.2d 701 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 2× “§ 30-2723 (a) (Reissue 1995), which provides in part that “on death of a party sums on deposit in a multiple-party account belong to the surviving party or parties,” and to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2724 (b) (Reissue 1995), which provides that “[a] right of survivorship arising from…”
Clarke v. First Nat. Bank of Omaha, 296 Neb. 632 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “Despite FNB’s internal procedure and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2724 (a) (Reissue 2016), each requiring signed written notice before changing an account’s type, Craven made the change to the Account before Hilda signed a new account agreement.”
In re Est. of Ackerman (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3× “Stat § 30-2724(a) (Reissue 2016), the type of bank account may be altered by written notice given by a party to the financial institution to change the type of account.”
In re Est. of Howard (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2724 (a) (Reissue 2016).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2724(a) — 3 cases
Newman v. Thomas, 652 N.W.2d 565 (Neb. 2002). “*806 The district court determined that § 30-2724 governs changing a non-POD, single-party account into a POD account.”
In re Est. of Ackerman (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). “Stat § 30-2724(a) (Reissue 2016), the type of bank account may be altered by written notice given by a party to the financial institution to change the type of account.”
In re Est. of Howard (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2724 (a) (Reissue 2016).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2724(b) — 1 case
In re Est. of Ackerman (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). “Stat § 30-2724(a) (Reissue 2016), the type of bank account may be altered by written notice given by a party to the financial institution to change the type of account.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.