Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 37
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-1001 (2026)

Act, how cited; termination

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 37-1001 to 37-1008 shall be known and may be cited as the Trail Development Assistance Act. The Trail Development Assistance Act shall terminate January 1, 2010, and any money in the Trail Development Assistance Fund at such time shall be transferred to the General Fund.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1981–2005 · leading case: Garreans ex rel. Garreans v. City of Omaha, 345 N.W.2d 309 (Neb. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Garreans ex rel. Garreans v. City of Omaha, 345 N.W.2d 309 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 12× “The majority opinion misconstrues the Recreation Liability Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 37-1001 through 37-1008 (Reissue 1978).”
Watson v. City of Omaha, 312 N.W.2d 256 (Neb. 1981). · cites it 10× “ugh the City of Omaha assigns several errors in this appeal, including the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment, contributory negligence of the plaintiff and her parents, and the absence of *257 negligence on the part of the defendant, the principal issue, and the…”
Bailey v. City of North Platte, 359 N.W.2d 766 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 8× “Plaintiff assigns as error that the trial court incorrectly determined that the city of North Platte was an "owner" within the meaning of the Recreation Liability Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 37-1001 et seq. (Reissue 1984), and in determining that no material issue of fact existed as…”
Gallagher ex rel. Gallagher v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist., 405 N.W.2d 571 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 8× “The district court found that while the flat area of the property in question was clearly within the protection of the Recreation Liability Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 37-1001 et seq. (Reissue 1984), the ravine area where the accident occurred was not, because "[t]here is no evidence…”
Brown v. Wilson, 567 N.W.2d 124 (Neb. 1997). · cites it 6× “The district court for Box Butte County granted summary judgment in favor of Kevin Wilson and Vickie Wilson, defendants in a negligence action, finding that the Nebraska Recreation Liability Act (Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-1001 et seq. (Reissue 1993), insulated the Wilsons from…”
Cassio v. Creighton Univ., 446 N.W.2d 704 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 4× “On cross-appeal Creighton contends the trial court erred in not sustaining its motions for a directed verdict or for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict because (1) the evidence established as a matter of law that the plaintiff’s action was barred by the Nebraska Recreation…”
McIntosh ex rel. McIntosh v. Omaha Pub. Schs., 544 N.W.2d 502 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 3× “trial court erred in finding that the lawsuit was not barred by the Nebraska Recreation Liability Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-1001 et seq. *531 (Reissue 1993).”
Iodence v. City of All., 700 N.W.2d 562 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 4× “See, also, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 37-1001 to 37-1008 (Cum.”
Veskerna v. City of West Point, Neb., 578 N.W.2d 25 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 4× “The district court for Cuming County, Nebraska, granted each appellee’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that the Recreation Liability Act (Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 37-1001 to 37-1008 (Reissue 1993), provided appellees statutory immunity, and appellant timely appealed.”
Teters v. Scottsbluff Pub. Schs., 567 N.W.2d 314 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “We conclude that under the Nebraska Recreation Liability Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-1001 et seq. (Reissue 1993), Kiwanis is not liable to Teters, and, therefore, we reverse the judgment of the district court.”
Thies v. City of Omaha, 408 N.W.2d 306 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 4× “Thies urges this court to reverse on three grounds: first, that the finding that the city did not act maliciously or willfully is contrary to the evidence; second, that the publicized attempts by the city to make the slides safe makes the city liable for negligence, because it…”
Teters v. Scottsbluff Pub. Schs., 592 N.W.2d 155 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 2× “The trial judge found that neither the School nor Kiwanis could invoke the protection of Nebraska’s Recreation Liability Act (Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-1001 et seq. (Reissue 1993).”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.