Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 39
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-644 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

39-644.

Transferred to section 60-6,109.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1981–2008 · leading case: State v. Mattan, 300 N.W.2d 810 (Neb. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Mattan, 300 N.W.2d 810 (Neb. 1981). · cites it 22× “As noted by the majority, the defendant was charged with unintentionally causing the death of a pedestrian while operating a motor vehicle in violation of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-644 (Reissue 1978). All the evidence relied upon by the State to obtain the conviction was circumstantial.”
State v. Welch, 747 N.W.2d 613 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 3× “2d 207, 210 (1988) (interpreting Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-644 (Reissue 1984), which was later transferred to § 60-6,109).”
State v. Merithew, 371 N.W.2d 110 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 4× “" In doing so we said: The ultimate fact here was the failure to exercise due care.”
Hines v. Pollock, 428 N.W.2d 207 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 8× “Plaintiff appeals, contending that the decision of the trial court is contrary to the evidence and the law and that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and in failing to properly apply the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-644 (Reissue…”
Carpender v. Bendorf, 516 N.W.2d 619 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-644 (Reissue 1988) provides: “Notwithstanding the other provisions of sections 39-601 to 39-6,122, every driver of a vehicle shall exercise due care to avoid colliding with any pedestrian upon any roadway and shall give an audible signal when necessary____”…”
Veskerna v. Erickson, 577 N.W.2d 736 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 2× “” Appellant contends that this statute, coupled with appellee’s testimony that he realized he was driving during the auto show and that he should exit from Main Street, suggest that the district court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.