For an agent of a foreign principal from an adversary nation or a foreign terrorist organization that is not an individual, each officer or director of such agent or person performing the functions of an officer or a director shall cause such agent to execute and file a registration statement and supplements to such statement as and when such filing is required under section 4-204 and shall also cause such agent to comply with sections 4-206 and 4-207 and all other requirements of the Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act. Dissolution of any organization acting as an agent of a foreign principal from an adversary nation or a foreign terrorist organization shall not relieve any such agent from complying with this section. In case of the failure of any such agent to comply with any of the requirements of the act, each of such agent's officers, directors, or persons performing the functions of officers or directors shall be subject to prosecution under the act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
13
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2014–2022 · leading case:
Jones v. Jones, 941 N.W.2d 501 (Neb. 2020).
Jones v. Jones, 941 N.W.2d 501 (Neb. 2020).
· cites it 5× “2020) should attach a child support worksheet, and the reason for any deviation from the minimum support amounts required by § 4-209 should be contained either in the court’s decree or order or on worksheet 5.”
Garza v. Garza, 846 N.W.2d 626 (Neb. 2014).
· cites it 2× “The purpose of § 4-209 is to provide for some support even in cases of very low income in order to reinforce the duties and obligations of being a parent.”
In re Interest of Cayden R., 27 Neb. Ct. App. 242 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 4× “However, § 4-209 states: It is recommended that even in very low income cases, a minimum support of $50, or 10 percent of the obligor’s net income, whichever is greater, per month be set.”
Lasu v. Issak, No. A-14-478 (Neb. Ct. App. July 28, 2015).
· cites it 5× “§ 9902 (2), except minimum support may be ordered as defined in § 4-209. (Emphasis supplied.) Our courts have never explicitly addressed the latter part of § 4-218 referencing the poverty guidelines in the Federal Register.”
Yeutter v. Barber, No. A-19-993 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2021).
· cites it 2× “(We note that effective January 1, 2020, Nebraska Child Support Guidelines § 4-209 was amended to provide in part, that “[e]ven in very low income cases, except in cases of disability or incarceration where a lower amount may be justified, a minimum monthly support of $50, or 10…”
Mohammed v. Rojas, 898 N.W.2d 396 (Neb. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “The purpose of § 4-209 is to provide some support even in cases of very low income in order to reinforce the duties and obligations of being a parent.”
State on behalf of Jenna W. & Jayden W. v. Dennis W., No. A-14-1064 (Neb. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2015).
· cites it 2× “2d 626 , 632 (purpose of § 4-209 is to provide for some support even in cases of very low income in order to reinforce the duties and obligations of being a parent).”
State on behalf of Eleanor S. v. Dustin S., No. A-15-593 (Neb. Ct. App. June 14, 2016).
“§ 9902 (2), except minimum support may be ordered as defined in § 4-209. Dustin argues that based on his gross monthly income of $2,080, his net income after deducting federal and state income taxes, FICA, and his prior child support obligation, is $1,439.”
Silver v. Silver, No. A-17-537 (Neb. Ct. App. June 5, 2018).
“§ 9902 (2), except minimum support may be ordered as defined in § 4-209 [$50, or 10 percent of the obligor’s net income, whichever is greater, per month].”
Jamison v. Jamison, No. A-17-1134 (Neb. Ct. App. Nov. 27, 2018).
“§ 9902 (2), except minimum support may be ordered as defined in § 4-209. -3- Neb. Ct. R. § 4-218 (rev. 2018).”
Smith v. McCright, No. A-21-602 (Neb. Ct. App. June 21, 2022).
“The Guidelines state that a “parent’s support, child care, and health care obligation shall not reduce his or her net income below the minimum of $1,133 net monthly for one person,” with an exception for the required minimum support as defined in § 4-209. See Neb. Ct. R. § 4-218…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.