Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 48
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-416 (2026)

Appeal; procedure

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person in interest who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Commissioner of Labor may appeal the decision, and the decision shall be in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2002–2016 · leading case: State v. Utter, 641 N.W.2d 624 (Neb. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Utter, 641 N.W.2d 624 (Neb. 2002). “” By reference to §§ 48-416(1), 28-401(4), and 28-405, quoted supra, it is clear that the “controlled substance[s]” in this case, for purposes of the tax stamp statute, are found in Schedule II.”
State v. Tompkins, 710 N.W.2d 654 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). “’ ” On September 2, 2004, the State filed an information charging Tompkins with one count of distribution of a controlled substance on or near a playground, one count of possession of a firearm while in violation of § 48-416(1), and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia.”
State v. Lovell (Neb. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “2014), a Class II misdemeanor; possession of a controlled substance, Lorazepam, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-416 (Cum. Supp. 2014), a Class IV felony; possession of a -1- controlled substance, methamphetamine, in violation of § 28-416(3), a Class IV felony; and…”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-416(1): 2 cases
State v. Utter, 641 N.W.2d 624 (Neb. 2002). “” By reference to §§ 48-416(1), 28-401(4), and 28-405, quoted supra, it is clear that the “controlled substance[s]” in this case, for purposes of the tax stamp statute, are found in Schedule II.”
State v. Tompkins, 710 N.W.2d 654 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). “’ ” On September 2, 2004, the State filed an information charging Tompkins with one count of distribution of a controlled substance on or near a playground, one count of possession of a firearm while in violation of § 48-416(1), and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.