Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 49-202.01 (2026)

Amendments proposed by Legislature; explanatory statement; requirements

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) When any proposal submitted by the Legislature is placed on the ballot for a vote of the electorate of the entire state, a statement in clear, concise language explaining the effect of a vote for and a vote against the proposal shall be printed immediately preceding the ballot title. Such statement shall be prepared by the Executive Board of the Legislative Council and submitted to the Secretary of State at least four months prior to the general election for certification to the election commissioners and county clerks along with the ballot titles. Such statement shall be printed in italics and shall be so worded as to not be intentionally an argument or likely to create prejudice either for or against the proposal. The statement shall also be published in italics preceding the ballot title on each proposal published pursuant to section 49-202.

(2) The four-month requirement prescribed in subsection (1) of this section shall not apply to any legislative proposal submitted to the electorate at a special election as provided in Article XVI, section 1, of the Constitution of Nebraska.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: State ex rel. Loontjer v. Gale, 288 Neb. 973 (Neb. 2014).
State ex rel. Loontjer v. Gale, 288 Neb. 973 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 3× “”27 In addition, except for special elections, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 49-202.01 (1) (Reissue 2010) imposes a statutory require- ment: The Executive Board of the Legislative Counsel must submit to the Secretary a clear, concise statement explaining the effect of a vote for or against…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 49-202.01(1) — 1 case
State ex rel. Loontjer v. Gale, 288 Neb. 973 (Neb. 2014). “”27 In addition, except for special elections, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 49-202.01 (1) (Reissue 2010) imposes a statutory require- ment: The Executive Board of the Legislative Counsel must submit to the Secretary a clear, concise statement explaining the effect of a vote for or against…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.