Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 5
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 5-203 (2026)

Transferred to section 50-1103

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

5-203.

Transferred to section 50-1103.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2024 · leading case: State v. Henderson, 762 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Henderson, 762 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 2009). “Code of Judicial Conduct § 5-203(B)(5). [92] See id. [93] See Neb.”
In re Marcuzzo, 770 N.W.2d 591 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 3× “§ 5-203. Canon 3. A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.”
In re Florom, 784 N.W.2d 897 (Neb. 2010). · cites it 2× “[10] § 5-203(A). [11] § 5-203(B)(1). [12] § 5-204(A).”
Nore Elec. v. S & H Holdings, 3 N.W.3d 895 (Neb. 2024). “Similarly, § 52-133(6) refers to the “apportionment” of construction liens, 35 which provides further support for the conclusion that the term “contracting owner’s” is used only to identify the geographic or spatial extent of the real estate to which a construction lien attaches.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 5-203(A): 1 case
In re Florom, 784 N.W.2d 897 (Neb. 2010). “[10] § 5-203(A). [11] § 5-203(B)(1). [12] § 5-204(A).”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 5-203(B)(1): 1 case
In re Florom, 784 N.W.2d 897 (Neb. 2010). “[10] § 5-203(A). [11] § 5-203(B)(1). [12] § 5-204(A).”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 5-203(B)(4): 1 case
In re Marcuzzo, 770 N.W.2d 591 (Neb. 2009). “§ 5-203. Canon 3. A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 5-203(B)(5): 1 case
State v. Henderson, 762 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 2009). “Code of Judicial Conduct § 5-203(B)(5). [92] See id. [93] See Neb.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 5-203(B)(7): 1 case
In re Marcuzzo, 770 N.W.2d 591 (Neb. 2009). “§ 5-203. Canon 3. A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.