Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 60
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-1422 (2026)

Franchise; hearing; approval

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No franchisor shall enter into any franchise for the purpose of establishing an additional motor vehicle, combination motor vehicle and trailer, motorcycle, or trailer dealership or warranty repair service facility, in any community in which the same line-make is then represented, unless the franchisor has first established in a hearing held under the Motor Vehicle Industry Regulation Act that there is good cause for such additional motor vehicle, combination motor vehicle and trailer, motorcycle, or trailer dealership under such franchise, or warranty repair service facility, and that it is in the public interest.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1977–2001 · leading case: New Motor Veh. Bd. of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 439 U.S. 96 (1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
New Motor Veh. Bd. of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 439 U.S. 96 (1978). · cites it 4× “1978-1979); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-1422 (1974); N. H. Rev.”
Gen. Motors Corp. v. O'Daniel Oldsmobile, Inc., 439 N.W.2d 453 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 5× “Section 60-1422 (Reissue 1988) provides: No franchisor shall enter into any franchise for the purpose of establishing an additional motor vehicle .”
New Motor Veh. Bd. of California v. Orrin W. Fox Co. Et Al., 434 U.S. 1345 (1978). “1977-1978); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-1422 (1974); N. H. Rev.”
Honda Cars of Bellevue v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 628 N.W.2d 661 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 13× “In an administrative proceeding pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-1422 (Reissue 1998), the Nebraska Motor Vehicle Industry Licensing Board (the Board) determined that American Honda Motor Company, Inc.”
Tober Foreign Motors, Inc. v. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc., 381 N.E.2d 908 (Mass. 1978). “1978); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-1422 (1974); N.M. Stat.”
Monmouth Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 509 A.2d 161 (N.J. 1986). “4 (1985); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 60-1422 (1974); Nev.Rev.Stat.”
Am. Motors Sales Corp. v. Perkins, 251 N.W.2d 727 (Neb. 1977). “§ 60-1422, R. R. S. 1943. Section 60-1429, R.”
Chrysler Corp. v. Jim Earp Chrysler-Plymouth, Ltd., 602 N.W.2d 43 (Neb. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 3× “The Board concluded that Chrysler could not enter into a franchise agreement with Grabe to sell Jeep products at Papillion without first complying with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-1422 (Reissue 1998), which requires a showing of good cause for an additional motor vehicle franchise and…”
Kizzier Chevrolet Co. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 363 N.W.2d 167 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “After an evidentiary hearing the licensing board dismissed the application, finding that an earlier application filed by the plaintiff had been denied on April 3, 1980, and that the Dalton Buick-Oldsmobile franchise was not a new or additional franchise.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.