Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 60
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-323 (2026)

Evidence of insurance, defined

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Evidence of insurance means evidence of a current and effective automobile liability policy in paper or electronic format.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1951–2020 · leading case: State v. Bowers, 548 N.W.2d 725 (Neb. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Bowers, 548 N.W.2d 725 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-323 (Reissue 1993). A violation of the motor vehicle registration statutes is a Class in misdemeanor, unless otherwise provided.”
State v. Sassen, 484 N.W.2d 469 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 2× “First, at the time the officers arrested defendant, they had reasonable cause to arrest defendant for at least three misdemeanors: (1) driving without a license plate on the front of the car she was driving, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-323 (Reissue 1988), classified as…”
State v. Kling, 599 N.W.2d 240 (Neb. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-323 (Reissue 1998), no person shall operate, drive, or park a motor vehicle on the public highways unless such vehicle at all times has displayed one number plate on the back thereof and one number plate on the front thereof.”
United States v. $45,000.00 in United States Currency, 749 F.3d 709 (8th Cir. 2014). “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-323 (2004). The relevant statute was amended in 2005, however, and the current version—and the version in place when Martins was stopped—requires that license plates be "plainly visible.”
State v. Spahnle, 469 N.W.2d 780 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 2× “01 (Reissue 1988); fictitious plates, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-323 (Reissue 1988); no valid registration, see Neb.”
Bank of Keystone v. Kayton, 50 N.W.2d 511 (Neb. 1951). · cites it 2× “equired to be registered, * * * operate or move the same upon the streets and highways of this state solely for purposes of transporting, testing, demonstrating, or use in the ordinary course * * * of his business as a * * * dealer, * * * or sell the same without registering…”
Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. v. Freudenburg, 938 N.W.2d 92 (Neb. 2020). “Second, it avoids the situation where a policy that includes coverage limits above 25/50/25 does not qualify as proof of an automobile liability policy elsewhere in the act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.