Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 60
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-601 (2026)

Rules, how cited

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 60-601 to 60-6,383 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Rules of the Road.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1959–2022 · leading case: Smith v. State, Dept. of Motor Vehs., 535 N.W.2d 694 (Neb. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Smith v. State, Dept. of Motor Vehs., 535 N.W.2d 694 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 4× “They are now codified at Neb.Rev.Stat. § 60-601 et seq. (Reissue 1993 & Cum.”
State v. Sikes, 834 N.W.2d 609 (Neb. 2013). · cites it 2× “Each of the assigned errors is governed by the Nebraska Rules of the Road, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 60-601 through 60-6,381 (Reissue 2010).”
Sun Ins. Co. of New York v. Aetna Ins. Co. of Hartford, 98 N.W.2d 692 (Neb. 1959). · cites it 9× “1943, and sections 60-601, 60-611, and 60-619, R. S.”
Biddlecome v. Conrad, 543 N.W.2d 170 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 4× “They are now codified at Neb.Rev.Stat. § 60-601 et seq. (Reissue 1993 & Cum.”
Hall v. Cnty. of Lancaster, 846 N.W.2d 107 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 2× “Sovereign Immunity (a) Issue The County argues that it maintained sovereign immunity for decisions made regarding the adoption and implementation of a sign-inspection policy. But Hall counters that the discre- tionary function exception was not an issue at trial.”
State v. Albarenga, 982 N.W.2d 799 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “ALBARENGA movement as is permitted by other indications shown at the same time, and such vehicular traffic shall yield the right-of-way to pedestrians lawfully within an adjacent crosswalk and to other traffic lawfully using the intersection; and (c) Unless otherwise directed by…”
Nguyen v. Rezac, 590 N.W.2d 375 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 2× “Nguyen refers to two statutes found within the Nebraska Rules of the Road, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-601 et seq. (Reissue 1993), in support of his challenge to instruction No.”
State v. Bartholomew, 602 N.W.2d 510 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 60-682 (Reissue 1998) (mandating that violation of Nebraska Rules of the Road is traffic infraction) and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-601 (Supp. 1997) (placing § 60-6,286 within Nebraska Rules of the Road).”
Hoppens v. Nebraska Dept. of Motor Vehs., 852 N.W.2d 331 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 2× “857 they are consistent, harmonious, and sensible.19 We give statu- tory language its plain and ordinary meaning, and we will not resort to interpretation to ascertain the meaning of statutory words which are plain, direct, and unambiguous.”
State v. Warriner, 675 N.W.2d 112 (Neb. 2004). · cites it 2× “The issue presented in this appeal is whether Warriner violated the Nebraska Rules of the Road, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-601 et seq. (Reissue 1998 & Supp.”
Sterner v. Lehmanowsky, 113 N.W.2d 588 (Neb. 1962). · cites it 3× “It is obvious that the Legislature intended that any person sustaining loss by reason of a motor vehicle dealer’s conduct in engaging in acts prohibited by law would be entitled to recourse on such a bond as the plaintiff’s bond in the instant case, regardless of the particular…”
Perrine v. State, Dep't of Motor Vehs., 544 N.W.2d 364 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 2× “They are now codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-601 et seq. (Reissue 1993, Cum.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.