Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 60
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-649 (2026)

Private road or driveway, defined

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Private road or driveway shall mean every way or place in private ownership and used for vehicular travel by the owner and those having express or implied permission from the owner but not by other persons.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2014–2020 · leading case: State v. Matit, 846 N.W.2d 232 (Neb. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Matit, 846 N.W.2d 232 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 2× “The arresting officer testified that he understood this area was a part of the city’s right-of-way. He also testified that he had observed the area on other occasions and had seen vehicles park in and then leave the paved area.”
State v. Grutell, 943 N.W.2d 258 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “As stated earlier, the issue of whether a vehicle was being operated or controlled on private property not open to public access is ordinarily a fact question to be determined by the fact finder, and not an issue to be determined as a matter of law.”
State v. Sieckmeyer, No. A-19-259 (Neb. Ct. App. Feb. 25, 2020). · cites it 3× “§ 60-649 (Reissue 2010) defined a private road or driveway to mean “‘every way or place in private ownership and used for vehicular travel by the owner and those having express or implied permission from the owner but not by other persons,’” the Supreme Court concluded as a…”
State v. Stubbendick, No. A-14-242 (Neb. Ct. App. Sept. 30, 2014). · cites it 3× “The Supreme Court noted Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-649 (Reissue 2010), which provides, “Private road or driveway shall mean every way or place in private ownership and used for vehicular travel by the owner and those having express or implied permission from the owner but not by other…”
State v. Frank, No. A-14-532 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2015). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-649 (Reissue 2010). The court also stated that its conclusion was not affected by the fact that the vehicle was overhanging the sidewalk, because a sidewalk is not for vehicular use.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.