Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1029 (2026)

Budget authority for general fund budget of expenditures; vote to exceed; procedure

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A school district may exceed the budget authority for the general fund budget of expenditures prescribed in section 79-1023 by an amount approved by a majority of legal voters voting on the issue at a primary, general, or special election called for such purpose upon the recommendation of the board or upon the receipt by the county clerk or election commissioner of a petition requesting an election, signed by at least five percent of the legal voters of the district. The recommendation of the board or the petition of the legal voters shall include the amount by which the board would increase its general fund budget of expenditures for the ensuing school year over and above the budget authority for the general fund budget of expenditures prescribed in section 79-1023. The county clerk or election commissioner shall place the question on the primary or general election ballot or call for a special election on the issue after the receipt of such board recommendation or legal voter petition. The election shall be held pursuant to the Election Act or section 77-3444, and all costs for a special election shall be paid by the district. A vote to exceed the budget authority for the general fund budget of expenditures prescribed in section 79-1023 may be approved on the same question as a vote to exceed the levy limits provided in section 77-3444.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Hawkins v. Johanns, 88 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D. Neb. 2000).
Hawkins v. Johanns, 88 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D. Neb. 2000). · cites it 10× “); Neb. Rev.Stat. Ann. § 79-1029 (Lexis 1999 Supp.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1029(2) — 1 case
Hawkins v. Johanns, 88 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D. Neb. 2000). “); Neb. Rev.Stat. Ann. § 79-1029 (Lexis 1999 Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.