Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 79
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-254 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 79-254 to 79-294 shall be known and may be cited as the Student Discipline Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1997–2017 · leading case: J.P. v. Millard Pub. Schs., 285 Neb. 890 (Neb. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
J.P. v. Millard Pub. Schs., 285 Neb. 890 (Neb. 2013). · cites it 3× “Without the student’s consent, the assistant principal then searched the truck.”
J.S. v. Grand Island Pub. Schs., 297 Neb. 347 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “On appeal under the Student Discipline Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-254 et seq. (Reissue 2014), the Hall County District Court affirmed, finding the suspension did not exceed the authority provided by §§ 79-264 and 79-267.”
Spencer Ex Rel. Spencer v. Omaha Pub. Sch. Dist., 566 N.W.2d 757 (Neb. 1997). · cites it 4× “02 (Reissue 1994) (now codified at Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 79-254 to 79-294 (Reissue 1996)).”
Parsons v. McCann, 138 F. Supp. 3d 1086 (D. Neb. 2015). · cites it 2× “” 16 The Nebraska Legislature enacted the Student Discipline Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 79-254 to 79-294 (Westlaw 2015), for the stated purpose of “assuring] the protection of all elementary and secondary school students’ constitutional right to due *1115 process and fundamental…”
Busch Ex Rel. Knave v. Omaha Pub. Sch. Dist., 623 N.W.2d 672 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 3× “ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR Busch assigns, consolidated and restated, that the district court erred in failing to reverse the decision of OPS because (1) rule 1(b) was outside the statutory authority of § 79-267 and (2) rule 1(b) is not clear and definite as required by § 79-262(1).”
Dohmen Ex Rel. Dohmen v. Twin Rivers Pub. Sch., 207 F. Supp. 2d 972 (D. Neb. 2002). · cites it 2× “The Nebraska Student Discipline Act, Neb. Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 79-254 to 79-294 (Michie 1997 & Lexis Cum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.