All money on hand and arising from the sale of schoolhouse and site and all other funds of the divided districts described in section 79-485 shall be divided among the several districts created in whole or part from the divided districts as nearly as practicable in proportion to the taxable valuation of the taxable property attached to the districts formed in whole or in part by such division.
Notes of Decisions
Bierman v. Campbell, 124 N.W.2d 918 (Neb. 1963).
· cites it 20× “Subsection (4) of section 79-486, R. S. Supp., 1961, provides in part as follows: “All the contracts, referred to in subsections (1), (2), and (3) of this section, shall be in writing and copies of all such contracts must be filed in the office of the county superintendent on or…”
Mann v. Wayne Cnty. Bd. of Equalization, 186 N.W.2d 729 (Neb. 1971).
· cites it 10× “Subsection (2) of that act provides: “The high school tuition rate for nonresident pupils shall be determined annually by the receiving district on a uniform basis for all pupils but such rate shall in no event be less than the average per pupil cost for the preceding school…”
Peterson v. Hancock, 54 N.W.2d 85 (Neb. 1952).
· cites it 2× “However, in the light of section 79-486, R. R. S. 1943, which provides that: “School districts, thus providing instruction for their children in neighboring districts, shall be considered as maintaining a school as required by law,” and the blanket restriction of sections 4 and…”
Werth v. Buffalo Cnty. Bd. of Equalization, 188 N.W.2d 442 (Neb. 1971).
· cites it 6× “, 1969, which provides in part: “The high school tuition rate for nonresident pupils shall be determined annually by the receiving district on a uniform basis for all pupils but such rate shall in no event be less than the average per pupil cost for the preceding school year…”
Jesse v. Box Butte Cnty. Bd. of Equalization, 374 N.W.2d 235 (Neb. 1985).
· cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-486 (Reissue 1981). The cost of providing high school education is then divided between the Class I “sending” districts and the Class III “receiving” districts.”
Lentz v. Saunders, 255 N.W.2d 853 (Neb. 1977).
· cites it 6× “The claims made on this appeal are that the dissolution proceedings are void because: (1) The instruction contract for the 1973-74 school year was signed before the 1973 amendment, at which time another statute, section 79-486, R. R. S. 1943, permitted school districts to…”
Nelson v. Robertson, 188 N.W.2d 720 (Neb. 1971).
· cites it 14× “Plaintiffs challenge the authority of a county superintendent of schools to dissolve a school district and attach its territory to an adjoining district under the provisions of section 79-486, R. S. Supp., 1969. The trial court affirmed the dissolution and merger ordered by the…”
George v. Sch. Dist. No. 24 of Red Willow Cnty., 61 N.W.2d 401 (Neb. 1953).
· cites it 2× “Plowever, ever since that time they have not made written contracts as required by section 79-486, R. R. S. 1943, but have each year made oral agreements with such district for their instruction.”
Sch. Dist. of Murray v. Lancaster, 277 N.W.2d 558 (Neb. 1979).
“§ 79-486, R. R. S. 1943. To provide the necessary funds for this type of program, the statutes in question were enacted.”
Bd. of Educ. of Sch. v. Winne, 129 N.W.2d 255 (Neb. 1964).
· cites it 2× “He proceeded pursuant to the terms of section 79-486, R. S. Supp., 1961, and section 79-420, R.”
Connot v. Monroe, 227 N.W.2d 827 (Neb. 1975).
· cites it 2× “The sole power to determine pupil transportation is in section 79-486, R. R. S. 1943, restricting the Board’s power to contract for the transportation of pupils to an adjoining district, unless approved by the district.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-486(3): 1 case
Mann v. Wayne Cnty. Bd. of Equalization, 186 N.W.2d 729 (Neb. 1971).
“Subsection (2) of that act provides: “The high school tuition rate for nonresident pupils shall be determined annually by the receiving district on a uniform basis for all pupils but such rate shall in no event be less than the average per pupil cost for the preceding school…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.