Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-501 (2026)
Act, how cited
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 87-501 to 87-507 shall be known and may be cited as the Trade Secrets Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: Home Pride Foods, Inc. v. Johnson, 634 N.W.2d 774 (Neb. 2001).
Home Pride Foods, Inc. v. Johnson, 634 N.W.2d 774 (Neb. 2001). “(Consumer’s Choice), for a permanent injunction and damages under Nebraska’s Trade Secrets Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-501 et seq. (Reissue 1999).”
Infogroup, Inc. v. DatabaseLLC, 95 F. Supp. 3d 1170 (D. Neb. 2015). “(a) Proprietary Information Infogroup’s claim regarding its database rests, for purposes of the present motion, on the Nebraska Trade Secrets Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 87-501 et seq. See, filing 13 at 12-17; filing 81 at 21.”
Richdale Dev. Co. v. McNeil Co., 508 N.W.2d 853 (Neb. 1993). “Under the provisions of Nebraska’s Ttade Secrets Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-501 et seq. (Cum. Supp.”
Dick v. Koski Prof. Grp., 307 Neb. 599 (Neb. 2020). “(d) Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Fourth, KPG alleged that Dick violated Nebraska’s Trade Secrets Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-501 et seq. (Reissue 2014), by utilizing KPG’s trade secrets for his own benefit in the course of his employment with Bland.”
VKGS v. Planet Bingo, 309 Neb. 950 (Neb. 2021). “Later, during the trial of Planet Bingo’s claims, Planet Bingo’s software expert testified that the source code from the Canadian patent application contained approximately 3 percent of EPIC.”
Cy Wakeman, Inc. v. Nicole Price Consulting, LLC, 284 F. Supp. 3d 985 (D. Neb. 2018). “Wakeman's trade secrets claim is brought pursuant to the Nebraska Trade Secrets Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-501 et seq. And under Nebraska law, a "trade secret" is defined as information that: (a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being known to,…”
Strategic Staff Mgmt., Inc. v. Roseland, 619 N.W.2d 230 (Neb. 2000). “” Strategic brought suit against Profit for alleged violations of Nebraska’s Trade Secrets Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 87-501 through 87-507 (Reissue 1999), and for tortious interference with Strategic’s business contracts.”
Evans v. Gen. Motors Corp., 893 A.2d 371 (Conn. 2006). “(2005); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-501 et seq. (1999); Nev.”
Dethmers Mfg. Co. v. Automatic Equip. Mfg. Co., 23 F. Supp. 2d 974 (N.D. Iowa 1998). “” As noted above, Nebraska has a Trade Secrets Act (TSA) codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-501 et seq. Section 87-502(4) defines a “trade secret” under the Nebraska TSA as information, including, but not limited to, a drawing, formula, pattern, compilation, program, device,…”
Radiology Servs., Pc v. Hall, 780 N.W.2d 17 (Neb. 2010). “Gerald Rounsborg, regarding his retirement; assisted Rounsborg in competing with Radiology Services after his retirement; disclosed Radiology Services' confidential and proprietary information; and violated Nebraska's Trade Secrets Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 87-501 et seq. (Reissue…”
Magistro v. J. Lou, Inc., 703 N.W.2d 887 (Neb. 2005). “§§ 87-301 to 87-306 (Reissue 1999); and violation of the Trade Secrets Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 87-501 to 87-507 (Reissue 1999).”
AC Bluebonnet, LP v. Egan (D. Neb. 2023). “In this action, Bluebonnet asserts claims for breach of confidentiality and noncompete provisions of an employment contract, breach of the duty of loyalty in connection with an employment/ownership interest, and misappropriation of trade secrets under the Nebraska Trade Secrets…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.