Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 1 - JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT GENERALLY
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 1.4667 (2026)

Review of report of investigation; letter of caution; judge to respond to complaint under certain circumstances

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 1.4667  Review of report of investigation; letter of caution; judge to respond to complaint under certain circumstances.

      1.  The Commission shall review the report prepared pursuant to NRS 1.4663 to determine whether there is a reasonable probability that the evidence available for introduction at a formal hearing could clearly and convincingly establish grounds for disciplinary action against a judge.

      2.  If the Commission determines that such a reasonable probability does not exist, the Commission shall dismiss the complaint with or without a letter of caution. The Commission may consider a letter of caution when deciding the appropriate action to be taken on a subsequent complaint against a judge unless the caution is not relevant to the misconduct alleged in the subsequent complaint.

      3.  If the Commission determines that such a reasonable probability exists, the Commission shall require the judge to respond to the complaint in accordance with procedural rules adopted by the Commission.

      (Added to NRS by 1997, 1090; A 2009, 1343)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2007–2019 · leading case: In re Halverson, 169 P.3d 1161 (Nev. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Halverson, 169 P.3d 1161 (Nev. 2007). “4657(1) (explaining that the Commission must further investigate complaints that, if true, establish grounds for discipline); NRS 1.4667 (stating that, if the Commission determines that a sufficient reason exists to proceed against the judge, then the Commission must require the…”
Andress-Tobiasson (Melanie) v. Nev. Comm'n on Jud. Discipline (Nev. 2019). · cites it 3× “462, NRS 1.4667, Commission Procedural Rule 12(3), and Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct (NCJC) Rule 2.”
Andress-Tobiasson (Melanie) v. Nev. Comm'n on Jud. Discipline (Nev. 2019). · cites it 3× “462, NRS 1.4667, Commission Procedural Rule 12(3), and Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct (NCJC) Rule 2.”
Jones v. Nev. Comm'n on Jud. Discipline, 2014 NV 11 (Nev. 2014). · cites it 4× “NRS 1.4667. If the results showed sufficient reason to proceed, in that there existed a likelihood that the evidence would clearly and convincingly establish grounds for discipline, the Commission would require the judge to respond to the complaint.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 1.4667(3) — 2 cases
Andress-Tobiasson (Melanie) v. Nev. Comm'n on Jud. Discipline (Nev. 2019). “462, NRS 1.4667, Commission Procedural Rule 12(3), and Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct (NCJC) Rule 2.”
Andress-Tobiasson (Melanie) v. Nev. Comm'n on Jud. Discipline (Nev. 2019). “462, NRS 1.4667, Commission Procedural Rule 12(3), and Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct (NCJC) Rule 2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.