Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 100.060 (2026)

Agreements between principals and sureties for joint control of assets

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 100.060  Agreements between principals and sureties for joint control of assets.  It is lawful for any party of whom a bond, undertaking or other obligation is required, to agree with the party’s surety or sureties for the deposit of any money and assets for which the party and the party’s surety or sureties are or may be held responsible, with a bank, credit union, savings bank, safe-deposit or trust company, authorized by law to do business as such, or with another depository approved by the court or a judge thereof, if the deposit is otherwise proper, for the safekeeping thereof, and in such manner as to prevent the withdrawal of the money or assets or any part thereof, without the written consent of the surety or sureties, or an order of court or a judge thereof, made on such notice to the surety or sureties as the court or judge may direct; but the agreement does not in any manner release from or change the liability of the principal or sureties as established by the terms of the bond.

      [1:236:1949; 1943 NCL § 7633.01]—(NRS A 1999, 1456)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: Natko v. State, 435 P.3d 680 (Nev. 2018).
Natko v. State, 435 P.3d 680 (Nev. 2018). “" The statute is immediately preceded by a series of other statutes addressing "Agreements between principals and sureties for joint control of assets" ( NRS 100.060 ); "Deposits authorized in lieu of cash payment or surety bond for protection of State" ( NRS 100.”
Natko (helen) Vs. State, 2018 NV 103 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 2× “" The statute is immediately preceded by a series of other statutes addressing "Agreements between principals and sureties for joint control of assets" (NRS 100.060); "Deposits authorized in lieu of cash payment or surety bond for protection of State" (NRS 100.”
Natko v. State (Nev. 2018). · cites it 2× “" The statute is immediately preceded by a series of other statutes addressing "Agreements between principals and sureties for joint control of assets" (NRS 100.060); "Deposits authorized in lieu of cash payment or surety bond for protection of State" (NRS 100.”
Natko (helen) Vs. State, 2018 NV 103 (Nev. 2018). “" The statute is immediately preceded by a series of other statutes addressing "Agreements between principals and sureties for joint control of assets" (NRS 100.060); "Deposits authorized in lieu of cash payment or surety bond for protection of State" (NRS 100.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.