Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 104 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE—ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.1101 (2026)

Short titles

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 104.1101  Short titles.

      1.  This chapter, together with chapters 104A, 104B and 104C of NRS, may be cited as the Uniform Commercial Code.

      2.  This Article may be cited as the Uniform Commercial Code—General Provisions.

      (Added to NRS by 2005, 824)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2023 · leading case: In re Las Vegas Monorail Co., 429 B.R. 317 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Las Vegas Monorail Co., 429 B.R. 317 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2010). · cites it 2× “It is found in Nev.Rev.Stat. § 104.1101 et. seq. As with citations to Article 9, future citations in this opinion will be to the national version of Article 1.”
Tuan Ngoc Nguyen v. State, 14 P.3d 515 (Nev. 2000). “The Uniform Commercial Code (codified in Nevada at NRS 104.1101 et seq.) defines “draft” as an “order,” a “written instruction to pay money signed by the person giving the instruction.”
Havas v. Love, 514 P.2d 1187 (Nev. 1973). “NRS 104.1101 et seq. We find this contention to be without merit.”
C. Nicholas Pereos, Ltd. Vs. Bank of Am., N.A., 2015 NV 44 (Nev. 2015). · cites it 2× “See NRS 104.1101. Article 4, located at NRS 104.”
Shults v. Faulkiner (In re Faulkiner), 594 B.R. 426 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2018). “Negotiable instruments consisting of unconditional promises or orders to pay a fixed amount of money, see NRS 104.”
Nevada Integrated Behavioral Servs., Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (D. Nev. 2023). “See NRS 104.1101 et seq. Article 4 governs liability of a bank for events related 14 to payments handled by the bank.”
C. Nicholas Pereos, Ltd. Vs. Bank of Am., N.A., 2015 NV 44 (Nev. 2015). “See NRS 104.1101. Article 4, located at NRS 104.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.