Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.3401 (2026)
Signature necessary for liability on instrument
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 104.3401 Signature necessary for liability on instrument. A
person is not liable on an instrument unless the person:
1. Signed the instrument; or
2. Is represented by an agent or representative who signed the instrument and the signature is binding on him or her under NRS 104.3402.
(Added to NRS by 1965, 827; A 1993, 1277; 2023, 3184)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2012–2013 · leading case: In re Phillips, 491 B.R. 255 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2013).
In re Phillips, 491 B.R. 255 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2013). “§ 3-401(b) (2002); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 104.3401(2) (2011) ("A signature may be made manually or by means of a device or machine, and by the use of any name, including a trade or assumed name, or by a word, mark, or symbol executed or adopted by a person with present intention to…”
In re Stanley, 514 B.R. 27 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2012). “UCC § 3-401(b); Nev.Rev. Stat. § 104.3401(2) ("A signature may be made manually or by means of a device or machine, and by the use of any name, including a trade or assumed name, or by a word, mark, or symbol executed or adopted by a person with present intention to authenticate…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.3401(2) — 2 cases
In re Phillips, 491 B.R. 255 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2013). “§ 3-401(b) (2002); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 104.3401(2) (2011) ("A signature may be made manually or by means of a device or machine, and by the use of any name, including a trade or assumed name, or by a word, mark, or symbol executed or adopted by a person with present intention to…”
In re Stanley, 514 B.R. 27 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2012). “UCC § 3-401(b); Nev.Rev. Stat. § 104.3401(2) ("A signature may be made manually or by means of a device or machine, and by the use of any name, including a trade or assumed name, or by a word, mark, or symbol executed or adopted by a person with present intention to authenticate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.