Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.2055
Actions for damages for injury or wrongful death caused by deficiency in construction of improvements to real property: Determination of date of substantial completion of improvement to real property
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 11.2055 Actions for damages for injury or wrongful death caused by
deficiency in construction of improvements to real property: Determination of
date of substantial completion of improvement to real property.
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, for the purposes of this section and NRS 11.202, the date of substantial completion of an improvement to real property shall be deemed to be the date on which:
(a) The final building inspection of the improvement is conducted;
(b) A notice of completion is issued for the improvement; or
(c) A certificate of occupancy is issued for the improvement,
Ê whichever occurs later.
2. If none of the events described in subsection 1 occurs, the date of substantial completion of an improvement to real property must be determined by the rules of the common law.
(Added to NRS by 1999, 1444; A 2015, 17)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2016–2021 · leading case: SOMERSETT OWNERS ASS'N VS. SOMERSETT DEV. CO., LTD.
SOMERSETT OWNERS ASS'N VS. SOMERSETT DEV. CO., LTD. (2021)
“In this case, a six-year period applies. NRS 11.202 (2015).”
DYKEMA VS. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC. (2016)
“However, they disagree as to what act signifies the issuance of the notices for purposes of NRS 11.2055. Dykema and Turner argue that notices of completion are issued on the date they are recorded and that NRS 11.”
DYKEMA VS. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC. (2016)
“However, they disagree as to what act signifies the issuance of the notices for purposes of NRS 11.2055. Dykema and Turner argue that notices of completion are issued on the date they are recorded and that NRS 11.”
DEKKER/PERICH/SABATINI, LTD. VS DIST. CT. (CITY OF N. LAS VEGAS) (2021)
“See NRS 11.2055 (explaining the date of substantial .”
Urban Outfitters, Inc. v. United Construction Co. (2021)
“” NRS 11.2055(1). Contrary to Urban’s 2 arguments, it submitted documents in support of its Complaint which expressly state that it 3 received a “Certificate of Occupancy” on February 2, 2012.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.2055(1) — 4 cases
SOMERSETT OWNERS ASS'N VS. SOMERSETT DEV. CO., LTD. (2021)
“In this case, a six-year period applies. NRS 11.202 (2015).”
DYKEMA VS. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC. (2016)
“However, they disagree as to what act signifies the issuance of the notices for purposes of NRS 11.2055. Dykema and Turner argue that notices of completion are issued on the date they are recorded and that NRS 11.”
DYKEMA VS. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC. (2016)
“However, they disagree as to what act signifies the issuance of the notices for purposes of NRS 11.2055. Dykema and Turner argue that notices of completion are issued on the date they are recorded and that NRS 11.”
Urban Outfitters, Inc. v. United Construction Co. (2021)
“” NRS 11.2055(1). Contrary to Urban’s 2 arguments, it submitted documents in support of its Complaint which expressly state that it 3 received a “Certificate of Occupancy” on February 2, 2012.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.2055(1)(a) — 1 case
SOMERSETT OWNERS ASS'N VS. SOMERSETT DEV. CO., LTD. (2021)
“In this case, a six-year period applies. NRS 11.202 (2015).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.2055(2) — 3 cases
SOMERSETT OWNERS ASS'N VS. SOMERSETT DEV. CO., LTD. (2021)
“In this case, a six-year period applies. NRS 11.202 (2015).”
DYKEMA VS. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC. (2016)
“However, they disagree as to what act signifies the issuance of the notices for purposes of NRS 11.2055. Dykema and Turner argue that notices of completion are issued on the date they are recorded and that NRS 11.”
DYKEMA VS. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC. (2016)
“However, they disagree as to what act signifies the issuance of the notices for purposes of NRS 11.2055. Dykema and Turner argue that notices of completion are issued on the date they are recorded and that NRS 11.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.