Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 112 - FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS (UNIFORM ACT)
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.140 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 112.140  Short title.  This chapter may be cited as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.

      (Added to NRS by 1987, 8)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2024 · leading case: Leonard v. Coolidge (In Re Nat'l Audit Def. Network), 367 B.R. 207 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Leonard v. Coolidge (In Re Nat'l Audit Def. Network), 367 B.R. 207 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2007). · cites it 2× “Nev.Rev. Stat. § 112.140. Nevada has also adopted the UFTA provision regarding uniformity of construction among the states that have adopted it, and thus this opinion refers to state law decisions from other states which have also adopted the UFTA as authority for its…”
JLL Consultants, Inc. v. Gothner (In re AgFeed USA, LLC), 546 B.R. 318 (Bankr. D. Del. 2016). “Rather, the Trustee seeks to avoid the “[transfers as fraudulent under one or more of Nev.Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 112.140 to 112.250 (Nevada); Tenn.”
Dyer v. Eckols, 808 S.W.2d 531 (Tex. App. 1991). “§§ 36-601 to 36-613 (1988); Nev.Rev.Stat. §§ 112.140 to 112.250 (1987); N.”
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Nassiri (D. Nev. 2021). · cites it 2× “7 On July 28, 2015, plaintiffs filed a new action against Nassiri and others in this court for 8 violations of the Nevada Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act, Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 112.140 , et. seq. 9 (“UFTA Action”).”
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Obteen N. Nassiri (D. Nev. 2020). “20 || §§ 112.140, et seg., and invokes the Court’s diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.”
Bock, LLC v. Steelman (D. Nev. 2020). “180(1)(a), four years after the transfer was made or 8 one year after the transfer was or could reasonably have been discovered;22 9 • for claims under NRS § 112.”
NewRez LLC v. Haddad (D. Nev. 2024). “10 In count three, Shellpoint sues all defendants under the Nevada Fraudulent Transfer Act, 11 NRS 112.140 et seq.17 The transfer at the heart of this claim is Haddad’s alleged hot-potato 12 conveyance of the property out of the Teal Petals St.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.