Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 12.110 (2026)

Associates may be sued by name of association; summons; judgment to bind joint property

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 12.110  Associates may be sued by name of association; summons; judgment to bind joint property.  When two or more persons, associated in any business, transact such business under a common name, whether it comprise the names of such persons or not, the associates may be sued by such common name, the summons in such cases being served on one or more of the associates; and the judgment in the action shall bind the joint property of all the associates, in the same manner as if all had been made defendants and had been sued upon their joint liability.

      [1911 CPA § 65; RL § 5007; NCL § 8564]

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1963–1982 · leading case: Richard Matthews, Jr., Inc. v. Vaughn, 540 P.2d 1062 (Nev. 1975).
Richard Matthews, Jr., Inc. v. Vaughn, 540 P.2d 1062 (Nev. 1975). · cites it 2× “NRS 12.110 provides: “When two or more persons, associated in any business, transact such business under a common name, whether it comprise the names of such persons or not, the associates may be sued by such common name, the summons in such cases being served on one or more of…”
Diluzio v. United Elec., Radio & Mach. Wkrs. of Am., 435 N.E.2d 1027 (Mass. 1982). “§ 25-313 (1979); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 12.110 (1979); N.H. Rev.”
DiLuzio v. United Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers of Am., 435 N.E.2d 1027 (Mass. 1982). “§ 25-313 (1979); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 12.110 (1979); N.H. Rev.”
Owens v. Int'l Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers, 213 F. Supp. 927 (D. Nev. 1963). · cites it 5× “Nevada Revised Statutes, Section 12.110 reads: “When two or more persons, associated in any business, transact such business under a common name, whether it comprise the names of such persons or not, the associates may be sued by such common name, the summons in such cases being…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.