Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 125C - CUSTODY AND VISITATION
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0075 (2026)

Unlawful relocation with child; attorney’s fees and costs

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 125C.0075  Unlawful relocation with child; attorney’s fees and costs.  If a parent with primary physical custody or joint physical custody relocates with a child in violation of NRS 200.359:

      1.  The court shall not consider any post-relocation facts or circumstances regarding the welfare of the child or the relocating parent in making any determination.

      2.  If the non-relocating parent files an action in response to the violation, the non-relocating parent is entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred as a result of the violation.

      (Added to NRS by 2015, 2589)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Sternberg v. Warneck (D. Nev. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sternberg v. Warneck (D. Nev. 2024). · cites it 6× “8 NRS § 125C.0075 provides that if a parent with primary or joint physical custody 9 relocates with a child under certain wrongful or criminal circumstances and the non-relocating 10 parent “files an action in response to the violation,” then “the non-relocating parent is…”
Sternberg v. Warneck (D. Nev. 2024). · cites it 6× “8 NRS § 125C.0075 provides that if a parent with primary or joint physical custody 9 relocates with a child under certain wrongful or criminal circumstances and the non-relocating 10 parent “files an action in response to the violation,” then “the non-relocating parent is…”
Sternberg v. Warneck (D. Nev. 2024). · cites it 6× “19 NRS § 125C.0075 provides that if a parent with primary or joint physical custody 20 relocates with a child under certain wrongful or criminal circumstances and the non-relocating 21 parent “files an action in response to the violation,” then “the non-relocating parent is…”
Sternberg v. Warneck (D. Nev. 2024). “Non-Constitutional State Law Claims 15 The NV AG Defendants move to dismiss Sternberg’s claims for violations of NRS 16 § 125C.0075, tortious interference with parental rights, abuse of process, and 17 civil conspiracy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.