NRS
14.080 Service of process on foreign manufacturers, producers and
suppliers of products.
1. Any company, firm, partnership,
corporation or association created and existing under the laws of any other
state, territory, foreign government or the Government of the United States,
which manufactures, produces, makes, markets or otherwise supplies directly or
indirectly any product for distribution, sale or use in this state may be
lawfully served with any legal process in any action to recover damages for an
injury to a person or property resulting from such distribution, sale or use in
this state by mailing to the last known address of the company, firm,
partnership, corporation or association, by registered or certified mail return
receipt requested, a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint.
2. In all cases of such service, the
defendant has 40 days, exclusive of the day of service, within which to answer
or plead.
3. This section provides an additional
manner of serving process and does not invalidate any other service.
(Added to NRS by 1961,
57; A 1969,
18, 95;
1997,
473)
Notes of Decisions
Abraham v. Agusta, S.P.A., 968 F. Supp. 1403 (D. Nev. 1997).
· cites it 10× “§ 14.080, Nevada’s products liability long-arm statute, which governs service of process on foreign manufacturers, producers and suppliers of products.”
Metal-Matic, Inc. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 415 P.2d 617 (Nev. 1966).
· cites it 5× “Plaintiff in the lawsuit contends that Metal-Matic can properly be served with process pursuant to NRS 14.080, the so-called “one-act” or “long arm” statute of Nevada.”
Priest v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada, 760 P.2d 137 (Nev. 1988).
· cites it 3× “065(a) and NRS 14.080. NRS 14.065(a) provides that any person who transacts business within Nevada submits himself to the jurisdiction of Nevada courts, even if he acts through an agent; NRS 14.”
Myers v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 600 F. Supp. 977 (D. Nev. 1984).
· cites it 6× “In the instant asbestosis actions, the plaintiffs contend that Nevada’s products liability long-arm statute — Nev. Rev.Stat. § 14.080 (1983) — authorizes this Court to exercise personal jurisdiction over the named defendants.”
Jacobsen v. Ducommun, Inc., 484 P.2d 1095 (Nev. 1971).
· cites it 4× “ng inter alia; that the respondents sold and distributed beryllium and beryllium-copper alloys to his employer; that the respondents failed to warn the appellant of the dangers and hazards to his health relating to such products; that the respondents knew, or should have known,…”
Wilmack, Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 635 P.2d 296 (Nev. 1981).
· cites it 3× “Although our products liability long arm statute, NRS 14.080, states in the disjunctive the three means by which a foreign manufacturer can become subject to service in Nevada, 2 this court has.”
Jeppeson & Co. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 431 P.2d 260 (Nev. 1967).
· cites it 5× “The petitioner contends that the district court does not have jurisdiction since the Nevada “long-arm” statute [NRS 14.080], 1 under which process was served, applies only to an action to “recover damages for injury to *331 person or property,” and does not embrace an action for…”
Long v. Flanigan Warehouse Co., 382 P.2d 399 (Nev. 1963).
“Of interest also is NRS 14.080, providing for the service of process on foreign manufacturers, producers and suppliers.”
Benson Ex Rel. Osgood v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 454 P.2d 892 (Nev. 1969).
· cites it 3× “was served in West Virginia pursuant to *329 Nevada’s long-arm statute, NRS 14.080. 1 Heck’s, Inc. filed a motion in district court to quash the service of process, coupled with a motion to dismiss.”
Drew Rentals v. First Jud. Dist. Court, 438 P.2d 253 (Nev. 1968).
· cites it 3× “Plaintiffs have attempted to serve process on Drew Rentals pursuant to NRS 14.080, which provides: “Products liability: Service of process on foreign manufacturers, producers, suppliers.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.080(1) — 2 cases
Abraham v. Agusta, S.P.A., 968 F. Supp. 1403 (D. Nev. 1997).
“§ 14.080, Nevada’s products liability long-arm statute, which governs service of process on foreign manufacturers, producers and suppliers of products.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.