Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 159.183 (2026)

Compensation and expenses of guardian

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 159.183  Compensation and expenses of guardian.

      1.  Subject to the discretion and approval of the court and except as otherwise provided in subsection 5, a guardian must be allowed:

      (a) Reasonable compensation for the guardian’s services;

      (b) Necessary and reasonable expenses incurred in exercising the authority and performing the duties of a guardian; and

      (c) Reasonable expenses incurred in retaining accountants, attorneys, appraisers or other professional services.

      2.  Reasonable compensation and services must be based upon similar services performed for persons who are not under a legal disability. In determining whether compensation is reasonable, the court may consider:

      (a) The nature of the guardianship;

      (b) The type, duration and complexity of the services required; and

      (c) Any other relevant factors.

      3.  In the absence of an order of the court pursuant to this chapter shifting the responsibility of the payment of compensation and expenses, the payment of compensation and expenses must be paid from the estate of the protected person. In evaluating the ability of a protected person to pay such compensation and expenses, the court may consider:

      (a) The nature, extent and liquidity of the assets of the protected person;

      (b) The disposable net income of the protected person;

      (c) Any foreseeable expenses; and

      (d) Any other factors that are relevant to the duties of the guardian pursuant to NRS 159.079 or 159.083.

      4.  Any compensation or expenses, including, without limitation, attorney’s fees, must not be paid from the estate of the protected person unless and until the payment of such fees is approved by the court pursuant to this section or NRS 159.344, as applicable.

      5.  A guardian is not allowed compensation or expenses, including, without limitation, attorney’s fees, for services incurred by the guardian as a result of a petition to have him or her removed as guardian if the court removes the guardian.

      (Added to NRS by 1969, 431; A 2003, 1797; 2005, 818; 2011, 999; 2017, 2560, 3919)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1993–2022 · leading case: Foley v. Morse & Mowbray, 848 P.2d 519 (Nev. 1993).
Foley v. Morse & Mowbray, 848 P.2d 519 (Nev. 1993). “NRS 159.183 provides that “[a] guardian shall be allowed reasonable compensation for his services as guardian and .”
In Re: Guardianship of Echevarria, 2016 NV 45 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 12× “105, and NRS 159.183 apply. This opinion further addresses the requirements for a valid stipulation.”
In Re: Guardianship of Echevarria, 2016 NV 45 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 4× “105, and NRS 159.183 apply. This opinion further addresses the requirements for a valid stipulation.”
In re Guardianship & Est. of Echevarria, 2016 NV 45 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 3× “105, and NRS 159.183. See NRS 159.103 (dealing with claims against the estate of the ward); NRS 159.”
In Re: Guardianship of Jones, 2022 NV 6 (Nev. 2022). · cites it 2× “NRS 159.183(1) (noting that payment of attorney fees in guardianship cases is subject to discretion and approval of the court); Miller v.”
In re Guardianship of Jones (Nev. 2022). “NRS 159.183(1) (noting that payment of attorney fees in guardianship cases is subject to discretion and approval of the court); Miller v.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 159.183(1) — 2 cases
In Re: Guardianship of Jones, 2022 NV 6 (Nev. 2022). “NRS 159.183(1) (noting that payment of attorney fees in guardianship cases is subject to discretion and approval of the court); Miller v.”
In re Guardianship of Jones (Nev. 2022). “NRS 159.183(1) (noting that payment of attorney fees in guardianship cases is subject to discretion and approval of the court); Miller v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.