Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 175 - TRIAL
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.531 (2026)

Polling jury; further deliberation or discharge

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 175.531  Polling jury; further deliberation or discharge.  When a verdict is returned and before it is recorded the jury shall be polled at the request of any party or upon the court’s own motion. If upon the poll there is not unanimous concurrence, the jury may be directed to retire for further deliberation or may be discharged.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1432)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2009–2013 · leading case: Saletta v. State, 254 P.3d 111 (Nev. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Saletta v. State, 254 P.3d 111 (Nev. 2011). · cites it 12× “We hold that NRS 175.531 allows the district court some discretion *418 in its polling method, the district court’s polling method is reviewed for an abuse of discretion, and it will constitute reversible error if the totality of the circumstances indicate that the polling…”
Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc., 206 P.3d 403 (Cal. 2009). “Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 175.531 [essentially same as Or.”
Harrison v. Gillespie, 640 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2011). “The second statute, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.531 , requires the jury to be polled at the request of a party after the jury returns a verdict.”
Wood-Jimenez (Reina) v. State (Nev. 2013). · cites it 2× “See NRS 175.531. The record before this court does not support Wood-Jimenez's assertion that the district court questioned the juror after he indicated disagreement with the verdict.”
James Harrison v. Gillespie (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.531 . Polling jury; further deliberation or discharge.”
James Harrison v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.531 . Polling jury; further deliberation or discharge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.