Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176A.635 (2026)

Effect of violation of condition of probation, forfeiture and restoration of credits for good behavior

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 176A.635  Effect of violation of condition of probation, forfeiture and restoration of credits for good behavior.

      1.  If a court before which a probationer is brought pursuant to NRS 176A.630 determines that the probationer has violated a condition of probation, the probationer forfeits all or part of the credits for good behavior earned pursuant to NRS 176A.500 during probation, in the discretion of the court.

      2.  A forfeiture may be made only by the court after proof of the violation and notice to the probationer.

      3.  The court may restore credits forfeited for such reasons as it considers proper.

      4.  If the court provides for the forfeiture or restoration of credits for good behavior of a probationer pursuant to this section, the clerk of the court shall notify the Chief Parole and Probation Officer of the forfeiture or restoration of credits.

      (Added to NRS by 2009, 2512)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: Vickers (tracey) Vs. Dir., 2018 NV 91 (Nev. 2018).
Vickers (tracey) Vs. Dir., 2018 NV 91 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 2× “447, § 5, at 2513-14; NRS 176A.635(1); Webster v. State, 109 Nev.”
Vickers v. Dzurenda (Nev. 2018). · cites it 2× “447, § 5, at 2513-14; NRS 176A.635(1); Webster v. State, 109 Nev.”
Vickers (tracey) Vs. Dir., 2018 NV 91 (Nev. 2018). “447, § 5, at 2513-14; NRS 176A.635(1); Webster v. State, 109 Nev.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176A.635(1): 3 cases
Vickers (tracey) Vs. Dir., 2018 NV 91 (Nev. 2018). “447, § 5, at 2513-14; NRS 176A.635(1); Webster v. State, 109 Nev.”
Vickers v. Dzurenda (Nev. 2018). “447, § 5, at 2513-14; NRS 176A.635(1); Webster v. State, 109 Nev.”
Vickers (tracey) Vs. Dir., 2018 NV 91 (Nev. 2018). “447, § 5, at 2513-14; NRS 176A.635(1); Webster v. State, 109 Nev.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.