Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 179.105 (2026)
Retention of property taken on warrant by officer subject to court order; restoration of property to person from whom it was taken; technical irregularities will not quash warrant
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 179.105 Retention of property taken on warrant by officer subject to
court order; restoration of property to person from whom it was taken;
technical irregularities will not quash warrant. All
property or things taken on a warrant must be retained in an officer’s custody,
subject to the order of the court to which the officer is required to return
the proceedings before the officer, or of any other court in which the offense
in respect to which the property or things are taken is triable. If it appears
that the property taken is not the same as that described in the warrant, that
there is no probable cause for believing the existence of the grounds on which
the warrant was issued or that the property is determined pursuant to NRS 179.11518 to be subject to the
attorney-client privilege, the magistrate shall cause it to be restored to the
person from whom it was taken. However, no search warrant shall be quashed by
any magistrate or judge within this State nor shall any evidence based upon a
search warrant be suppressed in any criminal action or proceeding because of
mere technical irregularities which do not affect the substantial rights of the
accused.
(Added to NRS by 1967, 1460; A 2017, 1245)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2016–2023 · leading case: Charles v. City of Henderson (Nev. 2016).
Charles v. City of Henderson (Nev. 2016). “2006) (holding that conversion and replevin claims for the return of property seized in a criminal investigation accrue on the date on which the plaintiff was first able to demand the return of his property); see also NRS 179.105 (requiring police officers to retain all property…”
In re Search Warrants re Seizure of Docs. (Nev. 2023). “The motion was brought pursuant to NRS 179.105 (retention and restoration of property taken on warrant), NRS 1.”
In re Search Warrants re Seizure of Docs. (Nev. 2023). “The motion was brought pursuant to NRS 179.105 (retention and restoration of property taken on warrant), NRS 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.