Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 193 - CRIMINALITY GENERALLY
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 193.0145 (2026)

“Enter” defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 193.0145  “Enter” defined.  “Enter,” when constituting an element or part of a crime, includes the entrance of the offender, or the insertion of any part of the body of the offender, or of any instrument or weapon held in the offender’s hand and used or intended to be used to threaten or intimidate a person, or to detach or remove property.

      [Part 1911 C&P § 29; RL § 6294; NCL § 9978]—(NRS A 1973, 355; 1983, 815; 1985, 510)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2022 · leading case: United States v. David Brown, 957 F.3d 679 (6th Cir. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. David Brown, 957 F.3d 679 (6th Cir. 2020). “, Wayne R. LaFave & Austin W. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 8.”
Merlino v. State (Nev. 2015). · cites it 22× “The question raised in this appeal is whether COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA (0) 1947B ez)i-reAtJ ier1446e NRS 193.0145, NRS 205.060(1), and NRS 205.”
Cameron (Wayne) v. State (Nev. 2022). · cites it 12× “2 Cameron appeals, arguing, among other things, the conviction must be reversed because there is no evidence that his gun or body "entered" the truck within the meaning of NRS 193.0145 and that the bullet's entry into the truck did not constitute a burglary.”
Merlino v. State, 2015 NV 65 (Nev. 2015). · cites it 11× “48a900 1 ctB NRS 193.0145, NRS 205.060(1), and NRS 205.”
Merlino (carrie) Vs. State, 2015 NV 65 (Nev. 2015). · cites it 11× “The question raised in this appeal is whether COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA (0) 1947B ez)i-reAtJ ier1446e NRS 193.0145, NRS 205.060(1), and NRS 205.”
Merlino (carrie) Vs. State, 2015 NV 65 (Nev. 2015). · cites it 11× “The question raised in this appeal is whether COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA (0) 1947B ez)i-reAtJ ier1446e NRS 193.0145, NRS 205.060(1), and NRS 205.”
United States v. Lee Yerkes (6th Cir. 2020). “In 1986, the majority rule among the states was the instrument-for-crime approach; nineteen states had adopted the instrument-for-crime approach and eight had adopted the any- instrument approach.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.