Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 218D.330 (2026)
Effective date of legislative measure when not specifically prescribed; period during which legislative measure that expires by limitation remains effective
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 218D.330 Effective date of legislative measure when not specifically
prescribed; period during which legislative measure that expires by limitation
remains effective.
1. Each law and joint resolution passed by the Legislature becomes effective on October 1 following its passage, unless the law or joint resolution specifically prescribes a different effective date.
2. Each law and joint resolution passed by the Legislature which expires by limitation on a specific date remains effective until the last moment of the day on which it expires by limitation, unless the law or joint resolution specifically provides otherwise.
[1:6:1865; A 1925, 1; NCL § 7301]—(NRS A 1989, 2; 2011, 3194)
Tax Exemptions and Abatements
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2012–2021 · leading case: Salloum Vs. Boyd Gaming Corp., 495 P.3d 513 (Nev. 2021).
Salloum Vs. Boyd Gaming Corp., 495 P.3d 513 (Nev. 2021). “But the amendment did not provide an effective date, and thus, pursuant to NRS 218D.330 (providing effective date for legislative measures where Legislature does not specifically designate one), it took effect on October 1, 2019.”
State v. Barren, 279 P.3d 182 (Nev. 2012). “25, § 3, at 50-51; NRS 218D.330. Here, respondent Gregory Barren allegedly committed class A and B felonies at 17 years of age but was not identified until after reaching 21 years of age.”
Panorama Towers Condo. Unit Owners' Ass'n Vs. Hallier, 498 P.3d 222 (Nev. 2021). “NRS 218D.330(1) provides that "[e]ach law and joint resolution passed by the Legislature becomes effective on October 1 following its passage, unless the law or joint resolution specifically prescribes a different effective date.”
Cahuec v. Smith, No. 3:09-cv-00113 (D. Nev. Nov. 24, 2020). “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 218D.330(1) (formerly Nev.”
Colvin (Michael) v. State, No. 65724 (Nev. Aug. 10, 2016). “461, § 2, at 2826; NRS 218D.330(1). 2 The 2003 version of the statute added a sentence of 2 to 20 years but only for first-time offenders.”
Colvin (Michael) v. State, No. 65724 (Nev. Dec. 23, 2016). “461, § 2, at 2826; NRS 218D.330(1). 2 Defense counsel appeared to make this argument and concession under the mistaken belief that the district court also had the discretion to impose a sentence of 2 to 20 years' imprisonment under the 2003 statute, which was never an option for…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 218D.330(1): 4 cases
Panorama Towers Condo. Unit Owners' Ass'n Vs. Hallier, 498 P.3d 222 (Nev. 2021). “NRS 218D.330(1) provides that "[e]ach law and joint resolution passed by the Legislature becomes effective on October 1 following its passage, unless the law or joint resolution specifically prescribes a different effective date.”
Cahuec v. Smith, No. 3:09-cv-00113 (D. Nev. Nov. 24, 2020). “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 218D.330(1) (formerly Nev.”
Colvin (Michael) v. State, No. 65724 (Nev. Aug. 10, 2016). “461, § 2, at 2826; NRS 218D.330(1). 2 The 2003 version of the statute added a sentence of 2 to 20 years but only for first-time offenders.”
Colvin (Michael) v. State, No. 65724 (Nev. Dec. 23, 2016). “461, § 2, at 2826; NRS 218D.330(1). 2 Defense counsel appeared to make this argument and concession under the mistaken belief that the district court also had the discretion to impose a sentence of 2 to 20 years' imprisonment under the 2003 statute, which was never an option for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.