Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 241 - MEETINGS OF STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 241.036

Action taken in violation of chapter void

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 241.036  Action taken in violation of chapter void.  The action of any public body taken in violation of any provision of this chapter is void.

      (Added to NRS by 1983, 1012)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1986–2019 · leading case: Del Papa v. Board of Regents of the University & Community College System
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Del Papa v. Board of Regents of the University & Community College System (1998) nev · cites it 6× “[9] The Attorney General asked the district court to establish that the Regents violated the above cited provisions of the Open Meeting Law, and for an injunction prohibiting the Regents from repeating those violations.”
Attorney General v. Nevada Tax Comm'n (2008) nev · cites it 3× “Under NRS 241.036, actions taken in violation of the Open Meeting Law are void.”
McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson City (1986) nev “” NRS 241.036. We hold that the action of the Board terminating the city manager in closed session on August 13, 1985, violated the open meeting requirement of NRS 241.”
Dewey v. Redevelopment Agency of Reno (2003) nev “Schwing distinguishes between quorum jurisdictions (where the open meeting law is activated whenever a quorum of a public body is present), deliberation jurisdictions (jurisdictions which expressly apply their open meeting law to meetings of fewer than a quorum of a particular…”
Comm'n on Ethics of Nev. v. Hansen (2018) nev · cites it 4× “They argue that, because NOMA invalidates the Commission's original notice of appeal, NRS 241.036, and limits the ratification vote to prospective effect only, NRS 241.”
THE COMM'N. ON ETHICS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VS. HANSEN (2018) nev · cites it 6× “They argue that, because NOMA invalidates the Commission's original notice of appeal, NRS 241.036, and limits the ratification vote to prospective effect only, NRS 241.”
THE COMM'N. ON ETHICS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VS. HANSEN (2017) nev · cites it 6× “947A a quorum had met privately and taken action as a group, NRS 241.036 and NRS 241.0365(5) would apply, and the Assemblymen would prevail because, under NRS 241.”
THE COMM'N. ON ETHICS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VS. HANSEN (2018) nev · cites it 6× “They argue that, because NOMA invalidates the Commission's original notice of appeal, NRS 241.036, and limits the ratification vote to prospective effect only, NRS 241.”
THE COMM'N. ON ETHICS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VS. HANSEN (2017) nev · cites it 3× “947A a quorum had met privately and taken action as a group, NRS 241.036 and NRS 241.0365(5) would apply, and the Assemblymen would prevail because, under NRS 241.”
Nevada Partners v. Workforce Connections (2019) nvd · cites it 2× “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 241.036 ; Chanos v. Nevada Tax Com’n, 181 P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.