Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 281A.170 (2026)
“Willful violation” defined
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 281A.170 “Willful violation” defined. “Willful
violation” means a violation where the public officer or employee:
1. Acted intentionally and knowingly; or
2. Was in a situation where this chapter imposed a duty to act and the public officer or employee intentionally and knowingly failed to act in the manner required by this chapter,
Ê unless the Commission determines, after applying the factors set forth in NRS 281A.775, that the public officer’s or employee’s act or failure to act has not resulted in a sanctionable violation of this chapter.
(Added to NRS by 1999, 2728; A 2009, 1048; 2013, 3766; 2015, 917)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2013–2019 · leading case: Carrigan v. Comm'n on Ethics, 313 P.3d 880 (Nev. 2013).
Carrigan v. Comm'n on Ethics, 313 P.3d 880 (Nev. 2013). “NRS 281A.170 defines “[w]illful violation” to mean “the public officer or employee knew or reasonably should have known that his conduct violated” the Ethics Law.”
State, Dep't of Bus. & Indus. Vs. Titlemax of Nev., Inc., 2019 NV 44 (Nev. 2019). “1762 (defining "willfur in the insurance context as "with actual knowledge or belief that the act or omission constitutes a violation and with specific intent to commit the violation"); NRS 281A.170 (explaining that in the ethics in government context, a "willful violation"…”
Carrigan v. Nev. Comm'n on Ethics, 2013 NV 95 (Nev. 2013). “If the Commission believes the violation may also constitute a crime, it must refer the matter to the Attorney General or the district attorney "for a determination of whether a crime has been committed that warrants prosecution.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 281A.170(5) — 1 case
Carrigan v. Nev. Comm'n on Ethics, 2013 NV 95 (Nev. 2013). “If the Commission believes the violation may also constitute a crime, it must refer the matter to the Attorney General or the district attorney "for a determination of whether a crime has been committed that warrants prosecution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.