NRS
284.155 Regulations for classified service.
1. The Commission shall adopt a code of
regulations for the classified service.
2. The code must include regulations
concerning certifications and appointments for:
(a) Positions in classes having a maximum salary
of $12,500 or less as of December 31, 1980, where the regular procedures for
evaluation and certification are impracticable; and
(b) Classes where applicants for promotion are
not normally available.
Ê These
regulations may be different from the regulations concerning certifications and
appointments for other positions in the classified service.
[20:351:1953]—(NRS A 1963,
1041; 1981,
1040; 1983,
625; 2003,
1438)
Notes of Decisions
Oliver v. Spitz, 348 P.2d 158 (Nev. 1960).
· cites it 2× “The main question involved is whether or not the rules as promulgated by the Director of the State Department of Personnel pursuant to NRS 284.155 and as approved by the Advisory Personnel Commission have the same force and effect as the applicable statutes.”
Edwards v. State, Dep't of Human Resources, Div. of Health, 615 P.2d 951 (Nev. 1980).
· cites it 2× “The majority does cite Rule II E of the Rules for Personnel Administration, which was promulgated by the chief pursuant to NRS 284.155. This rule states that the Personnel Division may investigate the classification status of any existing position, which ultimately could be…”
Navarro v. State ex rel. Dep't of Human Resources, 655 P.2d 158 (Nev. 1982).
“390(1), Rules for Personnel Administration (“RPA”) adopted pursuant to NRS 284.155(1), XV.B(1)(b). If dissatisfied with the decision of the hearing officer, the employee may request that PAC review the hearing officer’s decision.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 284.155(1): 4 cases
Edwards v. State, Dep't of Human Resources, Div. of Health, 615 P.2d 951 (Nev. 1980).
“The majority does cite Rule II E of the Rules for Personnel Administration, which was promulgated by the chief pursuant to NRS 284.155. This rule states that the Personnel Division may investigate the classification status of any existing position, which ultimately could be…”
Navarro v. State ex rel. Dep't of Human Resources, 655 P.2d 158 (Nev. 1982).
“390(1), Rules for Personnel Administration (“RPA”) adopted pursuant to NRS 284.155(1), XV.B(1)(b). If dissatisfied with the decision of the hearing officer, the employee may request that PAC review the hearing officer’s decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.