Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 338.150 (2026)

Provisions requiring use of method of alternate dispute resolution before initiation of judicial action; exception

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 338.150 Provisions requiring use of method of alternate dispute resolution before initiation of judicial action; exception.

1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, a public body charged with the drafting of specifications for a public work shall include in the specifications a clause requiring the use of a method of alternate dispute resolution before initiation of a judicial action if a dispute arising between the public body and the contractor engaged on a public work cannot otherwise be settled.

2. The provisions of subsection 1 do not require the Department of Transportation to include such a clause in any contract entered into by the Department.

(Added to NRS by 1969, 618; A 1971, 621; 1979, 1796; 1985, 1462; 2003, 2438; 2005, 1808; 2009, 424)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2003–2021 · leading case: Harris Assocs. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 81 P.3d 532 (Nev. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Harris Assocs. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 81 P.3d 532 (Nev. 2003). · cites it 32× “” 9 The legislative history of NRS 338.150 indicates that the Legislature intended it to mandate arbitration.”

Global Graphic Resources LLC v. Triunfo, Inc. (D. Nev. 2021). · cites it 4× “, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 338.150 (1). Finally, GGR argues that Catalina’s claim that 21 Nevada Revised Statutes § 597.”

Triunfo, Inc. v. Global Graphic Resources LLC (D. Nev. 2021). · cites it 4× “, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 338.150 (1). Finally, GGR argues that Catalina’s claim that 21 Nevada Revised Statutes § 597.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 338.150(1) — 1 case

Harris Assocs. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 81 P.3d 532 (Nev. 2003). “” 9 The legislative history of NRS 338.150 indicates that the Legislature intended it to mandate arbitration.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 338.150(2) — 1 case

Harris Assocs. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 81 P.3d 532 (Nev. 2003). “” 9 The legislative history of NRS 338.150 indicates that the Legislature intended it to mandate arbitration.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 338.150(3) — 1 case

Harris Assocs. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 81 P.3d 532 (Nev. 2003). “” 9 The legislative history of NRS 338.150 indicates that the Legislature intended it to mandate arbitration.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.