Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 342.105 (2026)

Compliance with federal law required; adoption of regulations by Director of Department of Transportation

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 342.105 Compliance with federal law required; adoption of regulations by Director of Department of Transportation.

1. Any department, agency, instrumentality or political subdivision of this State, or any other public or private entity, which is subject to the provisions of the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655, and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto, and which undertakes any project that results in the acquisition of real property or in a person being displaced from his or her home, business or farm, shall provide relocation assistance and make relocation payments to each displaced person and perform such other acts and follow such procedures and practices as are necessary to comply with those federal requirements.

2. The Director of the Department of Transportation shall review the federal act and all amendments and regulations adopted pursuant thereto and adopt such regulations as the Director finds are necessary to enable the State of Nevada to comply with those federal requirements.

(Added to NRS by 1989, 633)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2024 · leading case: City of Reno v. Reno Gazette-Journal, 63 P.3d 1147 (Nev. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of Reno v. Reno Gazette-Journal, 63 P.3d 1147 (Nev. 2003). · cites it 14× “" [6] NRS 342.105 In 1989, the Nevada Legislature enacted NRS 342.”

McCarran Int'l Airport v. Sisolak, 137 P.3d 1110 (Nev. 2006). · cites it 4× “[108] In particular, NRS 342.105(1) provides that [a]ny department, agency, instrumentality or political subdivision of this State, .”

Long v. State of S.D., 2017 SD 78 (S.D. 2017). “105 mandates compliance with the Relocation Act, requiring that any entity subject to the act “shall provide relocation assistance” in contrast to the permissive language of SDCL 5-2-18.”

State, Dep't. of Transp. v. Cowan, 103 P.3d 1 (Nev. 2004). · cites it 2× “§§ 4601-4655 (2000) (codified in Nevada by NRS 342.105). [24] Ringle v. Bruton, 120 Nev.”

City of Las Vegas v. Cliff Shadows Prof'l Plaza, LLC, 293 P.3d 860 (Nev. 2013). “Further, we vacate the awards of just compensation and attorney fees to Cliff Shadows and remand this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

City of Las Vegas v. 180 Land Co., LLC, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 29 (Nev. 2024). · cites it 3× “The district court concluded an award was proper under (1) the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, per NRS 342.105; (2) Article 1, Section 22(4), of the Nevada Constitution; and (3) NRS 18.”

City of Sparks Vs. Reno Newspapers, Inc., 2017 NV 56 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “9(b), a federal regulation that was adopted by reference in NRS 342.105, can declare records confidential and exempt from disclosure under NRS 239.”

City of Sparks Vs. Reno Newspapers, Inc., 2017 NV 56 (Nev. 2017). “Accordingly, we hold that MRS 453A.370(5) confers upon the Division authority to grant confidentiality.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 342.105(1) — 3 cases

McCarran Int'l Airport v. Sisolak, 137 P.3d 1110 (Nev. 2006). “[108] In particular, NRS 342.105(1) provides that [a]ny department, agency, instrumentality or political subdivision of this State, .”

City of Reno v. Reno Gazette-Journal, 63 P.3d 1147 (Nev. 2003). “" [6] NRS 342.105 In 1989, the Nevada Legislature enacted NRS 342.”

City of Las Vegas v. 180 Land Co., LLC, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 29 (Nev. 2024). “The district court concluded an award was proper under (1) the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, per NRS 342.105; (2) Article 1, Section 22(4), of the Nevada Constitution; and (3) NRS 18.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.