Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 47 - GENERAL PROVISIONS; JUDICIAL NOTICE; PRESUMPTIONS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 47.110 (2026)

Limited admissibility

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 47.110  Limited admissibility.  When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but inadmissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the judge, upon request, shall restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly.

      (Added to NRS by 1971, 776)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1993–2024 · leading case: Leonard v. State, 17 P.3d 397 (Nev. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Leonard v. State, 17 P.3d 397 (Nev. 2001). · cites it 4× “However, we recognize that the district court has some discretion in admitting evidence pursuant to NRS 47.110. NRS 47.110 permits the *408 trial court to admit evidence that is admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another if, upon request, the judge instructs the…”
Tavares v. State, 30 P.3d 1128 (Nev. 2001). “NRS 47.110 (“When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but inadmissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the judge, upon request, shall restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly.”
Franco v. State, 866 P.2d 247 (Nev. 1993). · cites it 2× “See NRS 47.110; 1 McCor *1243 mick on Evidence § 59 (John W.”
Chadwick v. State, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 10 (Nev. 2024). · cites it 3× “In such circumstances, the general rule set forth in NRS 47.110 apphes: “When evidence which is admissible.”
Chadwick v. State, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 10 (Nev. 2024). · cites it 3× “In such circumstances, the general rule set forth in NRS 47.110 applies: "When evidence which is admissible .”
Valentine (keandre) Vs. State, 2019 NV 62 (Nev. 2019). · cites it 2× “See NRS 47.110 (discussing the limited admissibility of evidence and, upon request, the need for an instruction to restrict the jury's consideration to the proper scope).”
Pinney Jr. (kenneth) v. State, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 71 (Nev. 2024). “See NRS 47.110 (providing that when evidence is admitted for one purpose but is inadmissible for another purpose, the court, upon request, shall instruct the jury as to its proper scope).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.