Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 49.325 (2026)
Trade secrets
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 49.325 Trade secrets.
1. A person has a privilege, which may be claimed by the person or the person’s agent or employee, to refuse to disclose and to prevent other persons from disclosing a trade secret owned by him or her, if the allowance of the privilege will not tend to conceal fraud or otherwise work injustice.
2. When disclosure is directed, the judge shall take such protective measure as the interests of the holder of the privilege and of the parties and the furtherance of justice may require.
(Added to NRS by 1971, 787)
IDENTITY OF INFORMER
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2022 · leading case: Saini v. Int'l Game Tech., 434 F. Supp. 2d 913 (D. Nev. 2006).
Saini v. Int'l Game Tech., 434 F. Supp. 2d 913 (D. Nev. 2006). “See also, NRS 49.325 (abrogating trade secret privilege in those cases where invoking the privilege would “conceal fraud or otherwise work injustice”).”
In Re Cont'l Gen. Tire, Inc., 979 S.W.2d 609 (Tex. 1998). “§ 27-508 (1997); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 49.325 (Michie 1997); N.H.”
Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 818 P.2d 396 (Nev. 1991). “NRS 49.325(1) (emphasis added) provides in relevant part: “A person has a privilege .”
Pub. Serv. Com'n v. Eighth Jud. D. Ct., 818 P.2d 396 (Nev. 1991). “NRS 49.325(1) (emphasis added) provides in relevant part: "A person has a privilege .”
Neal v. Griepentrog, 837 P.2d 432 (Nev. 1992). “4 Although respondents contend that Hazen’s letters are protected as trade secrets under NRS 49.325 and NRS Chapter 600A, we conclude that the information in the letters does not constitute a trade secret because it is not a “formula, pattern, compilation, program device,…”
Wealthy Inc. v. Cornelia (D. Nev. 2022). “4 Plaintiffs further rely on 19 NRS 49.325, which Plaintiffs reiterate creates a bar to production of privileged information.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 49.325(1) — 2 cases
Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 818 P.2d 396 (Nev. 1991). “NRS 49.325(1) (emphasis added) provides in relevant part: “A person has a privilege .”
Pub. Serv. Com'n v. Eighth Jud. D. Ct., 818 P.2d 396 (Nev. 1991). “NRS 49.325(1) (emphasis added) provides in relevant part: "A person has a privilege .”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 49.325(a) — 1 case
Wealthy Inc. v. Cornelia (D. Nev. 2022). “4 Plaintiffs further rely on 19 NRS 49.325, which Plaintiffs reiterate creates a bar to production of privileged information.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 49.325(b) — 1 case
Wealthy Inc. v. Cornelia (D. Nev. 2022). “4 Plaintiffs further rely on 19 NRS 49.325, which Plaintiffs reiterate creates a bar to production of privileged information.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.