Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598.0955 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 598.0955  Applicability of NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive.

      1.  The provisions of NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, do not apply to:

      (a) Conduct in compliance with the orders or rules of, or a statute administered by, a federal, state or local governmental agency.

      (b) Publishers, including outdoor advertising media, advertising agencies, broadcasters or printers engaged in the dissemination of information or reproduction of printed or pictorial matter who publish, broadcast or reproduce material without knowledge of its deceptive character.

      (c) Actions or appeals pending on July 1, 1973.

      2.  The provisions of NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, do not apply to the use by a person of any service mark, trademark, certification mark, collective mark, trade name or other trade identification which was used and not abandoned prior to July 1, 1973, if the use was in good faith and is otherwise lawful except for the provisions of NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive.

      (Added to NRS by 1973, 1484; A 2005, 1227; 2007, 738; 2009, 1188; 2013, 1031; 2017, 1533, 4350; 2021, 1347, 1449)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2024 · leading case: EverySpace Constr., LLC v. Encor Solar, LLC (D. Nev. 2024).
EverySpace Constr., LLC v. Encor Solar, LLC (D. Nev. 2024). · cites it 3× “16 Moreover, because Angi made the allegedly false statement that it verifies listed contractors, the 17 exemption for publishers (NRS § 598.0955) does not apply. Therefore, I deny Angi’s motion as 18 to EverySpace’s claim that Angi violated NRS § 598.”
Manley v. MGM Resorts Int'l (D. Nev. 2023). · cites it 2× “First, under NRS § 598.0955(a), the NDTPA explicitly does not apply to 20 “[c]onduct in compliance with the orders or rules of, or a statute administered by federal, 21 state or local government agency.”
Bank Of New York Mellon v. Highland Ranch Homeowners Ass'n (D. Nev. 2020). “3 Defendant Highland Ranch claims that NRS 598.0955 prevents any liability because it 4 states that “the provisions of NRS 598.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598.0955(1)(b) — 1 case
EverySpace Constr., LLC v. Encor Solar, LLC (D. Nev. 2024). “16 Moreover, because Angi made the allegedly false statement that it verifies listed contractors, the 17 exemption for publishers (NRS § 598.0955) does not apply. Therefore, I deny Angi’s motion as 18 to EverySpace’s claim that Angi violated NRS § 598.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598.0955(a) — 1 case
Manley v. MGM Resorts Int'l (D. Nev. 2023). “First, under NRS § 598.0955(a), the NDTPA explicitly does not apply to 20 “[c]onduct in compliance with the orders or rules of, or a statute administered by federal, 21 state or local government agency.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.