Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 649 - COLLECTION AGENCIES
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 649.370 (2026)

Violation of federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 649.370  Violation of federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.  A violation of any provision of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1682 et seq., or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto, shall be deemed to be a violation of this chapter.

      (Added to NRS by 2007, 2500)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 2010–2025 · leading case: Karl v. Quality Loan Serv. Corp., 759 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (D. Nev. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Karl v. Quality Loan Serv. Corp., 759 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (D. Nev. 2010). · cites it 2× “Debt Collection Violations Under Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) Chapter 649 Plaintiff alleges violations of NRS section 649.370, which creates an independent state law cause of action for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”).”
Smith v. Cmty. Lending, Inc., 773 F. Supp. 2d 941 (D. Nev. 2011). · cites it 12× “In cases such as the present one, where the state claim directly incorporates the substance of federal law, see Nev. Rev Stat. § 649.370, and where the state claim raises no federal constitutional issues, federal-question jurisdiction exists only if the federal law that is…”
Baham v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC (D. Nev. 2020). · cites it 4× “1 16 Bayview moves to dismiss the § 649.370 claim because (1) Chapter 649 does not create a 17 private right of action, (2) the chapter allows Bayview to cure a licensing violation, which it did, 18 and (3) the complaint does not plausibly allege Bayview engaged in debt…”
Johnson v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 4× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 649.370 . 14 Further, as relevant here, the FDCPA itself provides for statutory damages in certain 15 circumstances.”
Richards v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 4× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 649.370 . 14 Further, as relevant here, the FDCPA itself provides for statutory damages in certain 15 circumstances.”
Hicks v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 4× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 649.370 . 14 Further, as relevant here, the FDCPA itself provides for statutory damages in certain 15 circumstances.”
Serotta v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 4× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 649.370 . 14 Further, as relevant here, the FDCPA itself provides for statutory damages in certain 15 circumstances.”
Lepore v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 4× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 649.370 . 14 Further, as relevant here, the FDCPA itself provides for statutory damages in certain 15 circumstances.”
Sisemore v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 4× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 649.370 . 14 Further, as relevant here, the FDCPA itself provides for statutory damages in certain 15 circumstances.”
Carson v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 4× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 649.370 . 14 Further, as relevant here, the FDCPA itself provides for statutory damages in certain 15 circumstances.”
Argueta v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 4× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 649.370 . 14 Further, as relevant here, the FDCPA itself provides for statutory damages in certain 15 circumstances.”
Prieto v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC (D. Nev. 2025). · cites it 4× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 649.370 . 14 Further, as relevant here, the FDCPA itself provides for statutory damages in certain 15 circumstances.”
Show all 24 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.