NRS
89.220 Professional relationship preserved. The
provisions of this chapter relating to professional associations do not modify
any law applicable to the relationship between a person furnishing professional
service and a person receiving such service, including liability arising out of
such professional service, but:
1. A member or employee of a professional
association shall not be personally liable in tort for any act in which the
member or employee has not personally participated.
2. A member or employee of a professional
association shall not be personally liable in contract for any contract which
the member or employee signs on behalf of a professional association within the
limits of his or her actual authority.
(Added to NRS by 1969,
523; A 2003,
3161)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2009–2016 · leading case:
Fierle v. Perez, 219 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2009).
Fierle v. Perez, 219 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2009).
· cites it 2× “NRS 89.220(1) provides that: The provisions of this chapter relating to professional associations do not modify any law applicable to the relationship between a person furnishing professional service and a person receiving such service, including liability arising out of such…”
Zhang v. Barnes, No. 67219 (Nev. Sept. 12, 2016).
“060 and NRS 89.220, as interpreted in Fierle, a physician's professional corporation, equally with the physician himself, can be a "provider of healthcare" for purposes of the cap NRS 41A.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 89.220(1): 1 case
Fierle v. Perez, 219 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2009).
“NRS 89.220(1) provides that: The provisions of this chapter relating to professional associations do not modify any law applicable to the relationship between a person furnishing professional service and a person receiving such service, including liability arising out of such…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.