N.M. Stat. » N.M. Stat. / Chapter 61 / Article 9
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 61-9-2 (2026)

Repealed.

✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
History: 1978 Comp., § 61-9-2, enacted by Laws 1989, ch. 41, § 2; repealed by Laws
2019, ch. 19, § 10.

                                     ANNOTATIONS

Repeals. — Laws 2019, ch. 19, § 10 repealed 61-9-2 NMSA 1978, as enacted by Laws
1989, ch. 41, § 2, relating to legislative findings and purpose, effective February 4,
2019. For provisions of former section, see the 2018 NMSA 1978 on
NMOneSource.com.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1997–1997 · leading case: Mills v. New Mexico State Bd. of Psychologist Examiners, 1997-NMSC-028, 941 P.2d 502.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mills v. New Mexico State Bd. of Psychologist Examiners, 1997-NMSC-028, 941 P.2d 502. · cites it 2× “See § 61-9-2(A). The Legislature granted the Board authority to promulgate rules, see § 61-9-6(B)(l), designed to protect the public “from the practice of psychology by unqualified persons and from unprofessional conduct by persons licensed to practice psychology!,]” see §…”
N.M. Stat. § 61-9-2(A): 1 case
Mills v. New Mexico State Bd. of Psychologist Examiners, 1997-NMSC-028, 941 P.2d 502. “See § 61-9-2(A). The Legislature granted the Board authority to promulgate rules, see § 61-9-6(B)(l), designed to protect the public “from the practice of psychology by unqualified persons and from unprofessional conduct by persons licensed to practice psychology!,]” see §…”
N.M. Stat. § 61-9-2(B): 1 case
Mills v. New Mexico State Bd. of Psychologist Examiners, 1997-NMSC-028, 941 P.2d 502. “See § 61-9-2(A). The Legislature granted the Board authority to promulgate rules, see § 61-9-6(B)(l), designed to protect the public “from the practice of psychology by unqualified persons and from unprofessional conduct by persons licensed to practice psychology!,]” see §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.