New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20 (2026)

Motion to set aside sentence; by defendant

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 440.20  Motion to set aside sentence; by defendant.
  1. At any time after the entry of a judgment, the court in which the
judgment was entered may, upon motion of the defendant, set aside the
sentence upon the ground that it was unauthorized, illegally imposed or
otherwise invalid as a matter of law.  Where the judgment includes a
sentence of death, the court may also set aside the sentence upon any of
the grounds set forth in paragraph (b), (c), (f), (g) or (h) of
subdivision one of section 440.10 as applied to a separate sentencing
proceeding under section 400.27, provided, however, that to the extent
the ground or grounds asserted include one or more of the aforesaid
paragraphs of subdivision one of section 440.10, the court must also
apply subdivisions two and three of section 440.10, other than paragraph
(d) of subdivision two of such section, in determining the motion. In
the event the court enters an order granting a motion to set aside a
sentence of death under this section, the court must either direct a new
sentencing proceeding in accordance with section 400.27 or, to the
extent that the defendant cannot be resentenced to death consistent with
the laws of this state or the constitution of this state or of the
United States, resentence the defendant to life imprisonment without
parole or to a sentence of imprisonment for the class A-I felony of
murder in the first degree other than a sentence of life imprisonment
without parole. Upon granting the motion upon any of the grounds set
forth in the aforesaid paragraphs of subdivision one of section 440.10
and setting aside the sentence, the court must afford the people a
reasonable period of time, which shall not be less than ten days, to
determine whether to take an appeal from the order setting aside the
sentence of death. The taking of an appeal by the people stays the
effectiveness of that portion of the court's order that directs a new
sentencing proceeding.
  2.  Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, the court must
deny such a motion when the ground or issue raised thereupon was
previously determined on the merits upon an appeal from the judgment or
sentence, unless since the time of such appellate determination there
has been a retroactively effective change in the law controlling such
issue.
  3.  Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, the court may
deny such a motion when the ground or issue raised thereupon was
previously determined on the merits upon a prior motion or proceeding in
a court of this state, other than an appeal from the judgment, or upon a
prior motion or proceeding in a federal court, unless since the time of
such determination there has been a retroactively effective change in
the law controlling such issue.  Despite such determination, however,
the court in the interest of justice and for good cause shown, may in
its discretion grant the motion if it is otherwise meritorious.
  4.  An order setting aside a sentence pursuant to this section does
not affect the validity or status of the underlying conviction, and
after entering such an order the court must resentence the defendant in
accordance with the law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1990–2026 · leading case: People v. Bagby, 11 Misc. 3d 882 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2006).
People v. Bagby, 11 Misc. 3d 882 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2006). · cites it 2× “Defendant filed a motion pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20, and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he asserted that he should be resentenced based upon the Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Act (Penal Law §§ 60.”
People v. Aponte, 42 Misc. 3d 868 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013). · cites it 2× “By motion submitted July 24, 2013, defendant moves to vacate his sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20, on the basis that it violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
Geraci v. Senkowski, 23 F. Supp. 2d 246 (E.D.N.Y 1998). “Thereafter, the petitioner moved pursuant to New York’s Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20 for an order setting aside his sentence on the ground that it was illegally imposed (“the § 440 motion”).”
People v. Bond, 52 Misc. 3d 207 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “On January 13, 2012, defendant moved in Supreme Court, Bronx County, pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20, to set aside the persistent violent felony offender sentence imposed on July 13, 2010, and be resentenced as a second violent felony offender.”
Lilley v. James, 22 Misc. 3d 456 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008). “25 (2-a) (People v DeValle, 94 NY2d 870 [2000]), and the one-year time limit imposed by Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20 does not prevent the sentencing court from correcting its own errors.”
Janick v. Superintendent of Franklin Corr. Facility, 253 F. App'x 65 (2d Cir. 2007). “Fisher’s findings pursuant to Janick’s N.Y. Crim. Law § 440.20 motion, which more clearly articulated that Janick "most likely committed the act charged,” and that the evidence of guilt was "clear and convincing,” see People v.”
People v. Bryant, 2025 NY Slip Op 25154 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2025). · cites it 2× “Defendant Otis Bryant has moved for an order pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20 to set aside his sentence of seventeen years to life imprisonment.”
People v. Hernandez, 2025 NY Slip Op 25135 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2025). “Defendant Billy Hernandez has moved for an order pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20 to set aside his sentence of sixteen years to life imprisonment.”
People v. Hernandez, 2025 NY Slip Op 25135 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2025). “Defendant Billy Hernandez has moved for an order pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20 to set aside his sentence of sixteen years to life imprisonment.”
People v. Chambers, 32 Misc. 3d 699 (2011). · cites it 2× “He now moves, pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20, to set aside his “time served” sentence on the ground that the sentence was unlawful.”
Perez v. Royce (E.D.N.Y 2020). “The petitioner argues that New York’s Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20, which provides that “[a]t any time after the entry of a judgment, the court in which the judgment was entered may, upon motion of the defendant, set aside the sentence upon the ground that it was…”
Stuart v. Graham (E.D.N.Y 2020). “On the same day he filed his pro se motion for a writ of error coram nobis, Petitioner also moved pro se in the Supreme Court for an order setting aside his sentence pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20. Petitioner argued the consecutive sentences on the…”
— N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20(1) — 2 cases
People v. Buyund, 2019 NY Slip Op 8207 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.