New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law § 60.42 (2026)

Rules of evidence; admissibility of evidence of victim's sexual conduct in sex offense cases

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 60.42 Rules of evidence; admissibility of evidence of victim's sexual
          conduct in sex offense cases.
  Evidence of a victim's sexual conduct shall not be admissible in a
prosecution for an offense or an attempt to commit an offense defined in
article one hundred thirty or in section 230.34 of the penal law unless
such evidence:
  1. proves or tends to prove specific instances of the victim's prior
sexual conduct with the accused; or
  2. proves or tends to prove that the victim has been convicted of an
offense under section 230.00 of the penal law within three years prior
to the sex offense which is the subject of the prosecution; or
  3. rebuts evidence introduced by the people of the victim's failure to
engage in vaginal sexual contact, oral sexual contact, anal sexual
contact or sexual contact during a given period of time; or
  4. rebuts evidence introduced by the people which proves or tends to
prove that the accused is the cause of pregnancy or disease of the
victim, or the source of semen found in the victim; or
  5. is determined by the court after an offer of proof by the accused
outside the hearing of the jury, or such hearing as the court may
require, and a statement by the court of its findings of fact essential
to its determination, to be relevant and admissible in the interests of
justice.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2011 · leading case: People v. Scott.
People v. Scott (NY 2011). “This appeal requires the Court to resolve whether the trial court erred (1) in precluding evidence of a victim’s sexual conduct around the time of the incident pursuant to New York’s Rape Shield Law (Criminal Procedure Law § 60.42) and (2) in disqualifying one juror and failing…”
Benn v. Greiner (E.D.N.Y 2003). “I have an application under Criminal Procedure Law Section 60.42. It pertains to keeping the — the complainant should not be questioned about any other or prior sexual experience.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.