New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Penal Law § 485.10 (2026)
Sentencing
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 485.10 Sentencing. 1. When a person is convicted of a hate crime pursuant to this article, and the specified offense is a violent felony offense, as defined in section 70.02 of this chapter, the hate crime shall be deemed a violent felony offense. 2. When a person is convicted of a hate crime pursuant to this article and the specified offense is a misdemeanor or a class C, D or E felony, the hate crime shall be deemed to be one category higher than the specified offense the defendant committed, or one category higher than the offense level applicable to the defendant's conviction for an attempt or conspiracy to commit a specified offense, whichever is applicable. 3. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a person is convicted of a hate crime pursuant to this article and the specified offense is a class B felony: (a) the maximum term of the indeterminate sentence must be at least six years if the defendant is sentenced pursuant to section 70.00 of this chapter; (b) the term of the determinate sentence must be at least eight years if the defendant is sentenced pursuant to section 70.02 of this chapter; (c) the term of the determinate sentence must be at least twelve years if the defendant is sentenced pursuant to section 70.04 of this chapter; (d) the maximum term of the indeterminate sentence must be at least four years if the defendant is sentenced pursuant to section 70.05 of this chapter; and (e) the maximum term of the indeterminate sentence or the term of the determinate sentence must be at least ten years if the defendant is sentenced pursuant to section 70.06 of this chapter. 4. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a person is convicted of a hate crime pursuant to this article and the specified offense is a class A-1 felony, the minimum period of the indeterminate sentence shall be not less than twenty years. 5. In addition to any of the dispositions authorized by this chapter, the court shall require as part of the sentence imposed upon a person convicted of a hate crime pursuant to this article, that the defendant complete a program, training session or counseling session directed at hate crime prevention and education, where the court determines such program, training session or counseling session is appropriate, available and was developed or authorized by the court or local agencies in cooperation with organizations serving the affected community.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2013–2014 · leading case: The People v. Dwight R. DeLee, 26 N.E.3d 210 (N.Y. 2014).
The People v. Dwight R. DeLee, 26 N.E.3d 210 (N.Y. 2014). “The Legislature's treatment of hate crimes as greater offenses is further codified in Penal Law § 485.10, which provides that when a defendant is convicted of a hate crime and "the specified [equivalent ordinary] offense is a misdemeanor or a class C, D or E felony," the hate…”
People v. DeLee, 108 A.D.3d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2013). “Although the majority states that both offenses are class B violent felony offenses and “it thus cannot be said that one is the lesser of the other,” the statute imposes an enhanced sentence on a defendant convicted of manslaughter in the first degree as a hate crime in…”
Delee, Dwight, People v., No. KA 09-02479 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't July 19, 2013). “Although the majority states that both offenses are class B violent felony offenses and “it thus cannot be said that one is the lesser of the other,” the statute imposes an enhanced sentence on a defendant convicted of manslaughter in the first degree as a hate crime in…”
People v. DeLee, 108 A.D.3d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2013). “Although the majority states that both offenses are class B violent felony offenses and “it thus cannot be said that one is the lesser of the other,” the statute imposes an enhanced sentence on a defendant convicted of manslaughter in the first degree as a hate crime in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.