Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 1333
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 1333.68 (2026)

Uniformity of application and construction of provisions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
July 20, 1994
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 320 - 120th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

Sections 1333.61 to 1333.69 of the Revised Code shall be applied and construed to effectuate their general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to their subject among states enacting them.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Equip. & Mfg., Inc., 649 F. Supp. 2d 702 (N.D. Ohio 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Equip. & Mfg., Inc., 649 F. Supp. 2d 702 (N.D. Ohio 2009). · cites it 2× “See Ohio Rev.Code § 1333.68 (2006) (“Sections 1333.”
Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Equip. & Mfg., Inc., 805 F.3d 701 (6th Cir. 2015). · cites it 2× “” Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 1333.68 . The OUTSA provides that “trade secrets” include “scientific or technical information, design, process, procedure, formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or improvement” provided the secret has “independent economic…”
Adcor Indus., Inc. v. BEVCORP, LLC, 411 F. Supp. 2d 778 (N.D. Ohio 2005). · cites it 2× “See O.R.C. § 1333.68 (directing that the Ohio Act "shall be applied and construed to effectuate their general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to their subject among states enacting them”).”
State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State Univ., 721 N.E.2d 1044 (Ohio 2000). “” R.C. 1333.68; see, also, Preamble to Am.Sub.”
Al Minor & Assocs., Inc. v. Martin, 117 Ohio St. 3d 58 (Ohio 2008). “For example, in 2 Louis Altman, Callmann on Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies (5th Ed.”
Hanneman Fam. Funeral Home & Crematorium v. Orians, 2023 Ohio 3687 (Ohio 2023). “{¶ 35} Additionally, the Act instructs that its provisions “shall be applied and construed to effectuate [its] general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to [its] subject among states enacting [the Uniform Trade Secrets Act].”
Pro. Investing & Consulting Agency, Inc. v. SOS Sec., LLC (6th Cir. 2024). “2d 1044 , 1048–50 (Ohio 2000) (per curiam); see also Ohio Rev. Code § 1333.68. We do too when wagering an Erie guess.”
Metron Nutraceuticals, LLC v. Christina Rahm Cook (6th Cir. 2024). “Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 1333.68 . The vast majority—if not all—of courts interpreting various states’ iterations of the UTSA have held they do not preempt breach-of-contract claims.”
Coda Dev. S.R.O. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (Fed. Cir. 2025). “d) (addressing claims under the Kentucky Uniform Trade Secrets Act); see also Ohio Rev. Code § 1333.68 (stat- ing the sections of the act “shall be applied and construed to effectuate their general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to their subject among states…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.