Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 1345
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 1345.28 (2026)

Deceptive acts or practices

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
September 30, 1974
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 241 - 110th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

Failure to comply with sections 1345.21 to 1345.27 of the Revised Code constitutes a deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction in violation of section 1345.02 of the Revised Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Dillon v. Farmers Ins. of Columbus, Inc. (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 5407 (Ohio 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dillon v. Farmers Ins. of Columbus, Inc. (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 5407 (Ohio 2015). · cites it 3× “In R.C. 1345.28 and 1345.48, enacted in 1974 and 1976 respectively, the legislature stated that failure to comply with the sections simply “constitutes a deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction.”
Cartwright v. Beverly Hills Floors, 2013 Ohio 2266 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 3× “{¶27} R.C. 1345.28 provides: “Failure to comply with sections 1345.”
Hanlin v. Ohio Builders & Remodelers, Inc., 196 F. Supp. 2d 572 (S.D. Ohio 2001). · cites it 2× “R.C. § 1345.28. A “home solicitation sale” is defined as follows: [A] sale of consumer goods or services in which the seller or a person acting for the seller engages in a personal solicitation of the sale at a residence of the buyer, including solicitations in response to or…”
Griffin Contracting & Restoration v. McIntyre, 2018 Ohio 3121 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “{¶ 27} We note that the failure to comply with the HSSA constitutes a deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction in violation of the CSPA. R.C.”
Smaldino v. Larsick, 630 N.E.2d 408 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993). “R.C. 1345.28. Second, appellant argues in her brief that “appellee’s representations that the furnace had to be replaced, when, in fact, it was capable of repair, was violative of O.”
Orion Mgt., Inc. v. Kaeka, 2025 Ohio 1047 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “), citing R.C. 1345.28. The trial court determined, as a matter of law, that the CSPA did not apply to the Contract.”
Santos v. Buckeye 5, L.L.C., 2023 Ohio 3602 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “) {¶41} R.C. 1345.28 states: “Failure to comply with sections 1345.”
J & D Rack Co., Inc. v. Kreimer, 2011 Ohio 2358 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “See R.C. 1345.28 ("Failure to comply with sections 1345.”
Ostigny v. France, 2025 Ohio 4885 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “” R.C. 1345.28. 3. The Interplay Between Remedies Under the HSSA and the CSPA {¶55} As indicated above, “[w]hen a supplier has committed an unfair or deceptive act in connection with a consumer transaction, the consumer may ‘rescind the transaction or recover the consumer’s…”
Bramley's Water Conditioning v. Hagen, 501 N.E.2d 38 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985). “This was a deceptive sales act, R.C. 1345.28, in violation of R.C. 1345.02.”
Grinder v. Schaaf, 2025 Ohio 4723 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “07 (R.C. 1345.28). Brown v. Martinelli, 66 Ohio St.”
Horvath v. Waite (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2019). “Again, the only claim in Horvath’s state court complaint that even approaches the vicinity of fraud is the claim brought under the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.